Skip to content

Conversation

@jayshrivastava
Copy link
Collaborator

This change makes the explain output more concise by changing the stage formatting from

Tasks: t0:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t1:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t2:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t3:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5]

to

Tasks: t0:[p0..p5] t1:[p0..p5] t2:[p0..p5] t3:[p0..p5]

Closes: #192

@jayshrivastava jayshrivastava marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2025 20:47
@jayshrivastava jayshrivastava force-pushed the js/smaller-partition-groups branch 2 times, most recently from fe78b84 to 21a9685 Compare October 16, 2025 20:54
Copy link
Collaborator

@NGA-TRAN NGA-TRAN left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really like this.
Have we ever encountered non-contiguous numbering that would break this assumption?

@jayshrivastava jayshrivastava force-pushed the js/smaller-partition-groups branch 2 times, most recently from 3c35de5 to 3dc15e3 Compare October 16, 2025 21:47
This change makes the explain output more concise by changing the stage formatting from
```
Tasks: t0:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t1:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t2:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t3:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5]
```
to
```
Tasks: t0:[p0..p5] t1:[p0..p5] t2:[p0..p5] t3:[p0..p5]
```

Closes: #192
@jayshrivastava jayshrivastava force-pushed the js/smaller-partition-groups branch from 3dc15e3 to 9783fd5 Compare October 16, 2025 21:57
@jayshrivastava
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@NGA-TRAN No, this is not possible today.

Copy link
Collaborator

@gabotechs gabotechs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔥

@gabotechs gabotechs merged commit 3ab0805 into js/full-explain-analyze-rebased Oct 17, 2025
4 checks passed
@gabotechs gabotechs deleted the js/smaller-partition-groups branch October 17, 2025 10:17
jayshrivastava added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2025
This change makes the explain output more concise by changing the stage formatting from
```
Tasks: t0:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t1:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t2:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t3:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5]
```
to
```
Tasks: t0:[p0..p5] t1:[p0..p5] t2:[p0..p5] t3:[p0..p5]
```

Closes: #192
jayshrivastava added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2025
This change makes the explain output more concise by changing the stage formatting from
```
Tasks: t0:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t1:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t2:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t3:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5]
```
to
```
Tasks: t0:[p0..p5] t1:[p0..p5] t2:[p0..p5] t3:[p0..p5]
```

Closes: #192
jayshrivastava added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2025
This change makes the explain output more concise by changing the stage formatting from
```
Tasks: t0:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t1:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t2:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t3:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5]
```
to
```
Tasks: t0:[p0..p5] t1:[p0..p5] t2:[p0..p5] t3:[p0..p5]
```

Closes: #192
jayshrivastava added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2025
This change makes the explain output more concise by changing the stage formatting from
```
Tasks: t0:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t1:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t2:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5] t3:[p0,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5]
```
to
```
Tasks: t0:[p0..p5] t1:[p0..p5] t2:[p0..p5] t3:[p0..p5]
```

Closes: #192
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants