delete redundant old/unused code

Author: dbnyu

qunit_test_endrings.html

@@ -67,44 +67,14 @@
     });
 
 
-    //QUnit.test('Tubular Self Inductance (R_inner > 0)', function(assert) {
-    //  var bb = new BirdcageBuilder(16, 128e6, 10, 12);
 
-    //  // TODO need better tests with the k/ratio factor
-    //  // TODO can't easily force k to a nice number...
-    //  //assert.equal(bb.calc_leg_self_inductance_tube(1 0, 4), -1.5);
-    //  assert.deepEqual(bb.legs.calc_leg_self_inductance_tube(1, 2, 0), NaN);
-    //  assert.deepEqual(bb.legs.calc_leg_self_inductance_tube(0, 2, 0), NaN);
 
-		//	var c = 2*(0.1493 - 0.3606 - 0.0405 + 0.2526 - 1); // hack 
-    //  assert.equal(bb.legs.calc_leg_self_inductance_tube(1, 4, 4), c);
-    //});
+    // TODO continue tests
+    // TODO test final mutual inductance result
 
+    // TODO could test against Android/Java intermediate results (Leg/Endring Self & Mutual Inductance) with setup from qunit_test_all_math.html
 
-    //QUnit.test('Leg Mutual Inductance', function(assert) {
-    //  var bb = new BirdcageBuilder(1, 128e6, 1, 2);
-    //  bb.legs.set_legs_rect(1, 1); // TODO
 
-    //  // TODO is this really a bug, or is a loose tolerance assertion ok for this?
-    //  // why isn't it exact?
-    //  assert.close(bb.legs.helper_Lmn(1., 1.), 2*Math.log(2), 1e-15);
-    //  //assert.equal(bb.helper_Lmn(1., 1.), 2*Math.log(2));  // TODO - why isn't this exact? just flotaing point error???
-    //  //assert.equal(bb.
-
-    //  // TODO continue tests
-    //  // TODO test final mutual inductance result
-    //});
-
-    //QUnit.test('Shield Mutual Inductance', function(assert) {
-    //  var bb = new BirdcageBuilder(1, 128e6, 1, 2);
-
-    //  // TODO is this really a bug, or is a loose tolerance assertion ok for this?
-    //  // why isn't it exact?
-    //  assert.close(bb.legs.helper_Lmn(1., 1.), 2*Math.log(2), 1e-15);
-
-    //  // TODO continue tests
-    //  // TODO test final mutual inductance result
-    //});
 
 
   }); // end Birdcage End Rings tests