model naming conventions dictionary #5290
stephanclaus
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
This sounds great - and perhaps we should go one step further with prescribing some style defaults (e.g. Have a previous example of doing this via hooks as mentioned: https://gist.github.com/jeremyyeo/5e3bae4e7a2ff6c6b554880c0d8d0e86 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone,
I see with great interest that the community thinks more about namespaces and model naming conventions lately: (e.g. here https://docs.getdbt.com/blog/on-the-importance-of-naming).
One idea to allow enforcing naming conventions would be to implement for a "model name component dictionary" (naming things is hard) where
Checking these rules would simply be added to the dbt compile/run command.
Of course you could build something like this somehow with pre hooks already, but having this even more baked in the standard functionality sounds more appealing to me.
I am happy for any ideas and discussions here. I am happy to add this as an issue if more people are interested in it.
Cheers
Stephan
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions