thermal conductivity from different versions #1457
Unanswered
mayankaditya
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
Dear Mayank, The implementation of heat conductivity in 1.3.3 is actually not entirely correct. We fix the issue in #1093 . Please find more details there. Best, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I convert this issue to discussion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear Developers,
I have computed the thermal conductivity using the GK method, with force-field generated from deepmd-1.3.3; the results nicely agree with the experiments; they also show converged values. When I retrained the model using the 2.0.2 version, the results were entirely different (now showing large fluctuations in HACF and KAPPA data) with the same supercell size. Other features like PDF and MSD agree well between different versions.
I found this issue with many other systems as well.
Kindly suggest a possible solution.
Thanks,
Mayank
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions