Descriptor neuron vs fitting net neuron #1626
Unanswered
krishnapitike
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
You are free to tune parameters by yourself. See also https://docs.deepmodeling.org/projects/deepmd/en/v2.1.0/troubleshooting/howtoset_netsize.html. The timing of neural networks is also affected by the shape of inputs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
If you understand Chinese, you can look this: https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV19a41187MD?spm_id_from=333.337.search-card.all.click to understand this 2 networks. If you don't know Chinese, I recommend you read the paper to have a better understanding. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello, could you please explain the difference between "neuron" fields in Descriptor and fitting net sections. Specifically:
The neuron field in fitting net section is set to equal values from inner to outer layer (for example [240, 240, 240]), where as in the case of descriptor neuron, the number of nodes increases from inner to outer layer (for example [10, 20, 40]). Could you please explain the reason?
I am fitting a model for a BCC metallic system with vacancies and a cutoff radius= 6.5 Angstroms. Is there a recommended number of layers for neurons of fitting net and descriptor? My vacancy formation energy is over-predicted by 200 meV with descriptor neuron=[25,50,100,200] and fitting net neuron=[240,240,240,240]. Would you recommend neuron architecture with greater number of nodes and layers?
The fitting step time is doubling if I double the number of nodes in descriptor ([25,50,100,200]->[50,100,200,400]) but not increasing if I double the number of nodes in descriptor neuron ([240,240,240,240]->[480,480,480,480]). Could you please help me understand this behavior?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions