Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
Is the atomic scalar the desired output of your model? Do you have the labels for the scalar? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
The neural network parameters are atom type-wise by default. Thus, it's not necessary to train multiple models. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear all,
does anyone know if it is possible to train a model with atomic scalars for only one atom type ?
Let me explain.
We’re trying to fit the quadrupolar coupling of different types of nuclei for solid nmr study. This parameter is an atomic scalar and we would like to use one model per atom type.
In that optic, we thought about using a fparam.npy with "numb_fparam": = the number of atoms in the atom type.
However we have two issues with this methodology:
The first is that, because we want a scalar, the fitting net type is set to “energy” which does not permit the use of the “sel_type” keyword and thus we do not know how to specify which atom we are working on. So in that context how could we tell to the model what is the type we're interested in ?
The second one is that we do not know how to configure the loss, that is “type”: ener, because we can’t find a start/limit_pref that corresponds to the fparam.npy. So how can we configure the weight of the fparam in the loss function ?
thank you in advance for your help.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions