Replies: 1 comment 5 replies
-
Please see documentation
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
hello!
I prepared three types of AIMD data: 1. bulk-Al, 2. bulk-SiC, 3. interface-Al/SiC.
Therefore, the number of atomic types in our dataset may not be consistent. In the SiC dataset, the C atom is labeled as 0, and the Si atom is labeled as 1. In the Al dataset, the Al atom is labeled as 0. In the Al/SiC interface dataset, the aluminum atom is labeled as 0, the carbon atom is labeled as 1, and the silicon atom is labeled as 2.
How to ensure that the order of element types in the type_map parameter is consistent with the numbering of atomic types in the dataset?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions