Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
|
According to LAMMPS documentation, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I used DeePMD for generating a NN potential in the .pb format. And I can successfully run MD simulations using this potential, only when the whole system is described by the DeePMD generated potential. I'm using LAMMPS.
However, I'm looking at a specific case where I need part of my system to be described by the DeePMD potential, and the remainder to be described by standard CHARMM/OPLS force fields (similar to QM/MM except instead of QM it'll be the DeePMD potential). I would also like to use the DeePMD potential in conjunction with tabulated pair potentials.
I was trying to use commands of the following type :
pair_style hybrid deepmd graph.pb lj/cut/coul/long 10.0 10.0
pair_style hybrid/overlay deepmd graph.pb lj/cut/coul/long 10.0 10.0
pair_style hybrid deepmd graph.pb table spline 2000
pair_style hybrid/overlay deepmd graph.pb table spline 2000
However, I'm encountering numerous errors including illegal pair style / issues with identifying pair coefficients with the DeePMD potential, etc. This includes the following error:
ERROR: deepmd requires that the scale should be set to all atom types, i.e. pair_coeff * *.
Does the current implementation of DeePMD in LAMMPS support such a hybrid scheme? Or can it be used ONLY when the entire system is described by the DeePMD potential?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions