Finetune with large energy shift #3311
chtchelkatchev
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi, I hope I've got what you mean. The bias here may not be equal to the elemental energy (the energy of a single atom without neighbors), as the NN will contribute another bias. The fine-tune procedure only ensures that the total energy predicted by the model fits that in your dataset. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
When I fine tune a pretrained DeepMD model by a datatset with large shifts in elemental energy problems may arise. For example, Li has -0.95 eV/atom in GGA (https://next-gen.materialsproject.org/materials/mp-135/tasks/mp-990455) and -1.17 eV/atom in R2SCAN (https://next-gen.materialsproject.org/materials/mp-135/tasks/mp-1943895). How I should modify finetuning procedure? Can you provide an example with docs? What magnitude of the energy shift is crititcal for ``standard'' finetuning described in deepmd docs (https://docs.deepmodeling.com/projects/deepmd/en/master/train/finetuning.html)? I know about "atom_ener" parameter... There is a detailed discussion of the finetuning problem in the CHGnet documentation (https://github.com/CederGroupHub/chgnet/blob/main/examples/fine_tuning.ipynb)...
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions