Skip to content

Conversation

@jamesbhobbs
Copy link
Contributor

@jamesbhobbs jamesbhobbs commented Oct 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated code ownership configuration to reflect current team structure.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 23, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR adds a fourth default code owner to the repository's CODEOWNERS file. The change extends the default ownership entry from three maintainers to four by appending a new owner to the existing list. No functional code changes, configuration logic, or error handling are affected.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • saltenasl
  • Artmann

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "update codeowners to inc dino" directly and accurately describes the changeset: adding @dinohamzic to the CODEOWNERS default owners list. The title is concise, specific, and uses clear language that makes the primary change immediately understandable to someone reviewing the git history. No vague terms, noise, or misleading descriptions are present.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b2039e2 and 7deb61a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/CODEOWNERS (1)

2-2: LGTM. Welcome aboard, dino.

Syntax correct. Owner added cleanly.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 23, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 50.20%. Comparing base (b2039e2) to head (eba1b7a).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #43   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   50.20%   50.20%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines         249      249           
  Branches       26       26           
=======================================
  Hits          125      125           
  Misses        119      119           
  Partials        5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jamesbhobbs jamesbhobbs merged commit ef0931b into main Oct 23, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants