Commit a7f3479
MacroFake
Merge bitcoin#25353: Add a
4c9666b Mention `mempoolfullrbf` in policy/mempool-replacements.md (Antoine Riard)
aae66ab Update getmempoolinfo RPC with `mempoolfullrbf` (Antoine Riard)
3e27e31 Introduce `mempoolfullrbf` node setting. (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
This is ready for review.
Recent discussions among LN devs have brought back on the surface concerns about the security of multi-party funded transactions against pinnings attacks and other mempool-based nuisances. The lack of full-rbf transaction-relay topology connected to miners open the way to cheap and naive DoS against multi-party funded transactions (e.g coinjoins, dual-funded channels, on-chain DLCs, ...) without solutions introducing an overhead cost or centralization vectors afaik . For more details, see [0].
This PR implements a simple `fullrbf` setting, where the node always allows transaction replacement, ignoring BIP125 opt-in flag. The default value of the setting stays **false**, therefore opt-in replacement is still the default Bitcoin Core replacement policy. Contrary to a previous proposal of mine and listening to feedbacks collected since then [1], I think this new setting simply offers more flexibility in a node transaction-relay policy suiting one's application requirements, without arguing a change of the default behavior.
I [posted](https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-June/020557.html) on the ML to invite operators with a bitcoin application sensitive to full-rbf (e.g dual-funded LN channels service providers) or mempool researchers to join a bootstrapped full-rbf activated peers network for experimentation and learning. If people have strong opinions against the existence of such full-rbf transaction-relay network, I'm proposing to express them on the future thread.
[0] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2021-May/003033.html
[1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-June/019074.html
Follow-up suggestions :
- soft-enable opt-in RBF in the wallet : bitcoin#25353 (comment)
- p2p discovery and additional outbound connection to full-rbf peers : bitcoin#25353 (comment)
- match the code between RPC, wallet and mempool about disregard of inherited signaling : bitcoin#22698
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK bitcoin@4c9666b
glozow:
ACK 4c9666b, a few nits which are non-blocking.
w0xlt:
ACK bitcoin@4c9666b
Tree-SHA512: 9e288bf22e06a9808804e58178444ef1830c3fdd42fd8a7cd7ffb101f8f586e08b000679be407d63ca76a56f7216227b368ff630c81f3fac3243db1a1202ab1c-mempoolfullrbf node settingFile tree
10 files changed
+54
-1
lines changed- doc
- policy
- src
- kernel
- rpc
- test/functional
10 files changed
+54
-1
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
15 | 15 | | |
16 | 16 | | |
17 | 17 | | |
| 18 | + | |
| 19 | + | |
18 | 20 | | |
19 | 21 | | |
20 | 22 | | |
| |||
74 | 76 | | |
75 | 77 | | |
76 | 78 | | |
| 79 | + | |
| 80 | + | |
| 81 | + | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
86 | 86 | | |
87 | 87 | | |
88 | 88 | | |
| 89 | + | |
| 90 | + | |
| 91 | + | |
| 92 | + | |
89 | 93 | | |
90 | 94 | | |
91 | 95 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
558 | 558 | | |
559 | 559 | | |
560 | 560 | | |
| 561 | + | |
561 | 562 | | |
562 | 563 | | |
563 | 564 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
15 | 15 | | |
16 | 16 | | |
17 | 17 | | |
| 18 | + | |
| 19 | + | |
18 | 20 | | |
19 | 21 | | |
20 | 22 | | |
| |||
31 | 33 | | |
32 | 34 | | |
33 | 35 | | |
| 36 | + | |
34 | 37 | | |
35 | 38 | | |
36 | 39 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
33 | 33 | | |
34 | 34 | | |
35 | 35 | | |
| 36 | + | |
| 37 | + | |
36 | 38 | | |
37 | 39 | | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
663 | 663 | | |
664 | 664 | | |
665 | 665 | | |
| 666 | + | |
666 | 667 | | |
667 | 668 | | |
668 | 669 | | |
| |||
684 | 685 | | |
685 | 686 | | |
686 | 687 | | |
| 688 | + | |
687 | 689 | | |
688 | 690 | | |
689 | 691 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
458 | 458 | | |
459 | 459 | | |
460 | 460 | | |
| 461 | + | |
461 | 462 | | |
462 | 463 | | |
463 | 464 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
568 | 568 | | |
569 | 569 | | |
570 | 570 | | |
| 571 | + | |
571 | 572 | | |
572 | 573 | | |
573 | 574 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
740 | 740 | | |
741 | 741 | | |
742 | 742 | | |
743 | | - | |
| 743 | + | |
| 744 | + | |
| 745 | + | |
| 746 | + | |
744 | 747 | | |
745 | 748 | | |
746 | 749 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
83 | 83 | | |
84 | 84 | | |
85 | 85 | | |
| 86 | + | |
| 87 | + | |
| 88 | + | |
86 | 89 | | |
87 | 90 | | |
88 | 91 | | |
| |||
698 | 701 | | |
699 | 702 | | |
700 | 703 | | |
| 704 | + | |
| 705 | + | |
| 706 | + | |
| 707 | + | |
| 708 | + | |
| 709 | + | |
| 710 | + | |
| 711 | + | |
| 712 | + | |
| 713 | + | |
| 714 | + | |
| 715 | + | |
| 716 | + | |
| 717 | + | |
| 718 | + | |
| 719 | + | |
| 720 | + | |
| 721 | + | |
| 722 | + | |
| 723 | + | |
| 724 | + | |
| 725 | + | |
| 726 | + | |
| 727 | + | |
| 728 | + | |
| 729 | + | |
| 730 | + | |
| 731 | + | |
701 | 732 | | |
702 | 733 | | |
0 commit comments