applications.commands.read scope #3302
Unanswered
advaith1
asked this question in
API Feature Requests & Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Description
The restriction of the
applications.commands.update
scope to the client credentials grant broke a feature I made that displayed a list of bots' slash commands on a webpage. Since my use case only involved reading and not editing, it would be useful to have a read-only command scope that is available in standard OAuth. I don't think read-only access would be a security risk since it is info accessible by any user.Why This is Needed
Applications using the
update
scope to read commands were suddenly broken with no replacement. This would make that functionality possible again without the security issue.Alternatives Considered
update
scope and add more details about it in the authorize screen, and maybe a warning in the dev portal scope picker so people stop selecting it by accident (Add applications.commands.update back as a regular oauth scope #3449)Additional Details
Issue discussed in DDevs earlier
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions