Add applications.commands.update back as a regular oauth scope #3449
Unanswered
AnotherZane
asked this question in
API Feature Requests & Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Description:
The oauth scope,
applications.commands.update
was moved to a client credentials only scope as seen in issue #2443. However, a better alternative would be to add it back as a regular oauth scoped and make it more descriptive during the authorization flow since there are genuine use cases for it.Why This is Needed:
Registering and managing application commands is more of a one time process, it is not something that developers should really have to write a lot of code for. Discord does not provide developers with a dashboard to manage these commands.
While I do agree with #3302 as well, I do think that this scope would be fine since we have scopes such as
applications.store.update
.With the
applications.commands.update
, 3rd party tools using oauth can be created to assist developers in managing application commands more easily.Alternatives Considered:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions