Allow users and guilds to private their premium status

[erkinalp]

There are cases users might want to anonymously boost a guild: ideological conflicts, public service members that want to support private communities, users that want to appear poorer than they are (if you boost too much, or gift Nitro too much, users might think you are rich).

Users should be allowed to hide their premium status. Also to mention, bots should be allowed to anonymously boost guilds owned by human users, as long as choice of the guilds to be boosted is left to the bot itself and not the bot owner.

[Emzi0767]

choice of the guilds to be boosted is left to the bot itself and not the bot owner.

How would that work exactly? Is skynet upon us already and nobody noticed?

[erkinalp]

It is the non-legalese way of saying "bots shall act like a person separate from the bot owner when choosing which guild(s) to boost".

[Emzi0767]

No, these sentences have completely different meanings.

[Mineinjava]

Don't bot owners have ultimate choice over what the bot does?

[dynamicbark]

This seems like a general feature suggestion, which are supposed to be sent to https://dis.gd/feedback, not here.

[splatterxl]

I don't understand why bots would Nitro boost a server. How would the billing work? Why wouldn't bots be allowed to have Nitro then? Just... why?

[erkinalp]

Prepaid credits could be used to anonymise that part. The bot owner and/or bot users would top up some amount of credit, and the bot would autonomously spend the prepaid credit for crowd premium of a guild ("server boosting") or individual premium of self ("bot boosting").