Adding a bot with no permissions shouldn't create an unnecessary role #4637
-
When you include a However, when you include a non-zero value, and uncheck all the permissions before continuing, it will still create the role. This is annoying as a server owner, since I can't use the new feature of adding bots in-app on Desktop, because by default most of those links include some permissions, and if I don't want to be forced to have an undeletable role, I can't do anything about it. I need to open the link in the browser and change the This problematic role is created both in the Desktop app and on the website version of the authorize URL. On the other hand, why can't the role be deleted, if it is possible for it not to exist in the first place? TL;DR: it shouldn't matter whether the bot got invited with no permissions due to a user unchecking them with the checkboxes, or due to the user modifying the URL - the behavior should be the same |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
I can't repro this bug - I just added carl-bot in the client (using the Add to Server button) and unchecked all of the permissions, and no role was created. Tested on:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We figured the problem with @advaith1 in DMs and I created a bug issue in #4638 about it with steps to reproduce (@devsnek) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
We figured the problem with @advaith1 in DMs and I created a bug issue in #4638 about it with steps to reproduce
(@devsnek)