Skip to content

CBOR as an alternative format #6244

Jun 21, 2023 · 2 comments · 1 reply
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

No plans to do so. If ETF does not work for you, please consider using JSON. Note that our gateway speaking ETF is an optimization, as it's faster to serialize due to being the native format that Erlang uses to communicate within its distribution. CBOR, like JSON would not have that benefit, and would add additional complexity to the system for little to no gain.

Replies: 2 comments 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@ftilly
Comment options

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by jhgg
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
4 participants