Replies: 4 comments 4 replies
-
|
Has the default been changed in git? or is it just Github doing that at the moment? In any case, let's do it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
With what ultimate purpose, really? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
FYI - We have switch over to use In your own local repository, perform the following: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Pete actually got that backwards;
git checkout -b main upstream/main
…On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:59 AM Robert Krawitz ***@***.***> wrote:
Not working for me:
Fetching origin
Fetching upstream
$ git checkout -b upstream/main main
fatal: 'main' is not a commit and a branch 'upstream/main' cannot be created from it```
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2080 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOXGP6ORIIW3XVLSK7RVFG3S42XU7ANCNFSM4WXNSA4A>
.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello folks!
What do folks think about renaming
mastertomain?Recently, I mistakenly merged a few PRs where the commits were not squashed, and some of the first lines were not <= 50 characters.
I have already created a proposed
mainbranch with those fixes applied, and saved the existingmasterbranch asmaster-2021.01.11.Thoughts?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions