Fix for Issue #32 arguments not working #41
Conversation
Now works with naval fate example.
|
@jkcko Looks like this is unmaintained… I've added support for C89 and a few minor linting improvements: https://github.com/offscale/docopt.c/tree/c Would love to merge your changes 😄 |
@SamuelMarks Looks like that last merge was back on Sep 26, 2016. Looks like the maintainer has disappeared and that's unfortunate. Perhaps there just wasn't enough interest in the C version of docopt. Did you merge my changes to your own fork and try them yourself? |
|
Unfortunately I only just found your PR… happy to accept new PRs to my fork There are a few new features I've added, and a bunch more I have planned. The C89 support was a little finicky, but now that is valid also. Yeah, it's annoying that @kblomqvist @ffunenga and @keleshev disappeared :\ |
I would like my changes to support positional arguments (Issue #32) to be considered for merging.
The naval fate example now works with options before or after the positional arguments.