remove resolveDescribeQuery rule
#2726
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jycor
changed the title
resolveDescribeQuery rule
max-hoffman
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2024
Contributor
max-hoffman
left a comment
max-hoffman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It might be worth actually writing down a few alternatives in the PR description, convince ourselves that this is the safest/most maintainable way to do this. Like why not one level above/below this call point?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This rule just recurses into the analyzer, so we should just do it right at the beginning, so we should do it right away and avoid calling all other rules.
This would be better/cleaner in the planbuilder, but we would need to tell the analyzer to not analyze this node or skip it somehow.
It's possible to move this logic into
analyzeWithSelector.It might be more difficult to move this above
Analyze, as we'd have to put this logic in a variety of places.