Choosenim future? #332
Description
Hey @dom96, I see that choosenim hasn't received a lot of attention in some time.
We at the https://github.com/codex-storage team rely on choosenim for our local dev workflow and with m* series of chips becoming more widespread getting #294 merged would be very useful.
I wonder what your overall plans with this tool are, we could definitely help maintain it if you're moving on to other things.