|
| 1 | +import type { User, Membership } from "@dotkomonline/types" |
| 2 | +import { z } from "zod" |
| 3 | +import type { DBHandle, Prisma } from "@dotkomonline/db" |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +// This file implements the logic for merging two user accounts. |
| 6 | +// |
| 7 | +// It is split into three parts: |
| 8 | +// 1. Field classification (how they will be merged) |
| 9 | +// 2. A type check to make sure every field is classified (exhaustiveness check) |
| 10 | +// 3. The merge implementation |
| 11 | +// |
| 12 | +// In general, we keep everything from the survivor user, and backfill from the consumed user only when the survivor has |
| 13 | +// null/empty values. We have some custom logic for memberships and other fields. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +// FIELD CLASSIFICATION |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +/** These fields are omitted during the merge. */ |
| 18 | +const OMITTED_FIELDS = [ |
| 19 | + "id", // |
| 20 | + "createdAt", |
| 21 | + "updatedAt", |
| 22 | +] as const satisfies UserKeys[] |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +/** Keep the survivor's value; if it is null, backfill from the consumed user. */ |
| 25 | +const BACKFILL_SCALAR_FIELDS = [ |
| 26 | + "name", |
| 27 | + "email", |
| 28 | + "imageUrl", |
| 29 | + "biography", |
| 30 | + "phone", |
| 31 | + "gender", |
| 32 | + "dietaryRestrictions", |
| 33 | + "ntnuUsername", |
| 34 | + "workspaceUserId", |
| 35 | +] as const satisfies UserKeys[] |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +/** |
| 38 | + * Keep the survivor's value; if it is null, backfill from the consumed user. |
| 39 | + * |
| 40 | + * These fields should be cleaned if orphaned after the merge. Remember to update BACKFILL_RELATION_NAMES as well. |
| 41 | + */ |
| 42 | +const BACKFILL_RELATION_FK_FIELDS = [ |
| 43 | + "privacyPermissionsId", // |
| 44 | + "notificationPermissionsId", |
| 45 | +] as const satisfies UserKeys[] |
| 46 | +/** Needed for type checking */ |
| 47 | +const BACKFILL_RELATION_NAMES = [ |
| 48 | + "privacyPermissions", // |
| 49 | + "notificationPermissions", |
| 50 | +] as const satisfies UserKeys[] |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +/** Fields with custom merge logic. */ |
| 53 | +const CUSTOM_MERGE_FIELDS = [ |
| 54 | + "profileSlug", // |
| 55 | + "flags", |
| 56 | +] as const satisfies UserKeys[] |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +/** These relations are reassigned from the consumed user to the survivor. */ |
| 59 | +const REASSIGN_RELATION_NAMES = [ |
| 60 | + "attendee", |
| 61 | + "personalMark", |
| 62 | + "givenMarks", |
| 63 | + "attendeesRefunded", |
| 64 | + "auditLogs", |
| 65 | + "deregisterReasons", |
| 66 | + "notificationsUpdated", |
| 67 | + "notificationsReceived", |
| 68 | + "notificationsCreated", |
| 69 | +] as const satisfies UserKeys[] |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +/** Relations with custom merge logic. */ |
| 72 | +const CUSTOM_MERGE_RELATION_NAMES = [ |
| 73 | + "memberships", // |
| 74 | + "groupMemberships", |
| 75 | +] as const satisfies UserKeys[] |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +// EXHAUSTIVENESS CHECK |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +type AllAccountedFields = |
| 80 | + | (typeof OMITTED_FIELDS)[number] |
| 81 | + | (typeof BACKFILL_SCALAR_FIELDS)[number] |
| 82 | + | (typeof BACKFILL_RELATION_FK_FIELDS)[number] |
| 83 | + | (typeof BACKFILL_RELATION_NAMES)[number] |
| 84 | + | (typeof CUSTOM_MERGE_FIELDS)[number] |
| 85 | + | (typeof REASSIGN_RELATION_NAMES)[number] |
| 86 | + | (typeof CUSTOM_MERGE_RELATION_NAMES)[number] |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +// This is all keys of the Prisma User model, including relations (which are not present on the User type) |
| 89 | +type UserKeys = keyof Prisma.$UserPayload["objects"] | keyof Prisma.$UserPayload["scalars"] |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +type MissingFromClassification = Exclude<UserKeys, AllAccountedFields> |
| 92 | +type ExtraInClassification = Exclude<AllAccountedFields, UserKeys> |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +// These will cause a compile error if they are anything other than `never` |
| 95 | +// IF YOU COME HERE FROM TYPE ERROR: You need to classify the field(s) you added in the above arrays. |
| 96 | +const _assertNoMissingFields: MissingFromClassification extends never ? true : MissingFromClassification = true |
| 97 | +const _assertNoExtraFields: ExtraInClassification extends never ? true : ExtraInClassification = true |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +// IMPLEMENTATION |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +const isUuid = (value: string) => z.string().uuid().safeParse(value).success |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +const buildMembershipDeduplicationKey = (membership: Membership) => { |
| 104 | + return `${membership.type}:${membership.specialization ?? "null"}:${membership.semester ?? "null"}` |
| 105 | +} |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +export const mergeUsers = async (handle: DBHandle, survivorUser: User, consumedUser: User): Promise<void> => { |
| 108 | + // SCALAR BACKFILL |
| 109 | + // Fills null fields on survivor from consumed |
| 110 | + const scalarUpdates: Record<string, unknown> = {} |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | + for (const field of BACKFILL_SCALAR_FIELDS) { |
| 113 | + if (survivorUser[field] === null && consumedUser[field] !== null) { |
| 114 | + scalarUpdates[field] = consumedUser[field] |
| 115 | + } |
| 116 | + } |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | + for (const field of BACKFILL_RELATION_FK_FIELDS) { |
| 119 | + if (survivorUser[field] === null && consumedUser[field] !== null) { |
| 120 | + scalarUpdates[field] = consumedUser[field] |
| 121 | + } |
| 122 | + } |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | + // profileSlug rule: adopt consumed user's slug only if survivor's is a UUID and consumed's is not |
| 125 | + if (isUuid(survivorUser.profileSlug) && !isUuid(consumedUser.profileSlug)) { |
| 126 | + scalarUpdates.profileSlug = consumedUser.profileSlug |
| 127 | + } |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | + // flags rule: concat and deduplicate |
| 130 | + scalarUpdates.flags = [...new Set([...survivorUser.flags, ...consumedUser.flags])] |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | + await handle.user.update({ |
| 133 | + where: { |
| 134 | + id: survivorUser.id, |
| 135 | + }, |
| 136 | + data: scalarUpdates, |
| 137 | + }) |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | + // MERGE MEMBERSHIPS |
| 140 | + // We want to avoid duplicate memberships. |
| 141 | + const survivorMembershipKeys = new Set(survivorUser.memberships.map(buildMembershipDeduplicationKey)) |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | + const membershipIdsToTransfer = consumedUser.memberships |
| 144 | + .filter((membership) => !survivorMembershipKeys.has(buildMembershipDeduplicationKey(membership))) |
| 145 | + .map((membership) => membership.id) |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | + if (membershipIdsToTransfer.length > 0) { |
| 148 | + await handle.membership.updateMany({ |
| 149 | + where: { |
| 150 | + id: { |
| 151 | + in: membershipIdsToTransfer, |
| 152 | + }, |
| 153 | + }, |
| 154 | + data: { |
| 155 | + userId: survivorUser.id, |
| 156 | + }, |
| 157 | + }) |
| 158 | + } |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | + // Delete remaining duplicate memberships still owned by the consumed user |
| 161 | + await handle.membership.deleteMany({ |
| 162 | + where: { userId: consumedUser.id }, |
| 163 | + }) |
| 164 | + |
| 165 | + // MERGE GROUP MEMBERSHIPS |
| 166 | + const survivorGroupMemberships = await handle.groupMembership.findMany({ |
| 167 | + where: { |
| 168 | + userId: survivorUser.id, |
| 169 | + }, |
| 170 | + }) |
| 171 | + const consumedGroupMemberships = await handle.groupMembership.findMany({ |
| 172 | + where: { |
| 173 | + userId: consumedUser.id, |
| 174 | + }, |
| 175 | + }) |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | + const survivorActiveGroupIds = new Set( |
| 178 | + survivorGroupMemberships |
| 179 | + .filter((groupMembership) => groupMembership.end === null) |
| 180 | + .map((groupMembership) => groupMembership.groupId) |
| 181 | + ) |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | + // Transfer group memberships unless both users have an active membership in the same group |
| 184 | + const groupMembershipIdsToTransfer = consumedGroupMemberships |
| 185 | + .filter((groupMembership) => { |
| 186 | + const isActive = groupMembership.end === null |
| 187 | + const survivorAlreadyActiveInGroup = survivorActiveGroupIds.has(groupMembership.groupId) |
| 188 | + return !(isActive && survivorAlreadyActiveInGroup) |
| 189 | + }) |
| 190 | + .map((groupMembership) => groupMembership.id) |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | + if (groupMembershipIdsToTransfer.length > 0) { |
| 193 | + await handle.groupMembership.updateMany({ |
| 194 | + where: { |
| 195 | + id: { |
| 196 | + in: groupMembershipIdsToTransfer, |
| 197 | + }, |
| 198 | + }, |
| 199 | + data: { |
| 200 | + userId: survivorUser.id, |
| 201 | + }, |
| 202 | + }) |
| 203 | + } |
| 204 | + |
| 205 | + // Delete remaining duplicate group memberships still owned by the consumed user |
| 206 | + await handle.groupMembership.deleteMany({ |
| 207 | + where: { |
| 208 | + userId: consumedUser.id, |
| 209 | + }, |
| 210 | + }) |
| 211 | + |
| 212 | + // REASSIGN ALL RELATIONS TO SURVIVOR |
| 213 | + // Attendees (both "attended" and "refunded by" relations) |
| 214 | + await handle.attendee.updateMany({ |
| 215 | + where: { |
| 216 | + userId: consumedUser.id, |
| 217 | + }, |
| 218 | + data: { |
| 219 | + userId: survivorUser.id, |
| 220 | + }, |
| 221 | + }) |
| 222 | + await handle.attendee.updateMany({ |
| 223 | + where: { |
| 224 | + paymentRefundedById: consumedUser.id, |
| 225 | + }, |
| 226 | + data: { |
| 227 | + paymentRefundedById: survivorUser.id, |
| 228 | + }, |
| 229 | + }) |
| 230 | + |
| 231 | + // Personal marks (received and given) |
| 232 | + await handle.personalMark.updateMany({ |
| 233 | + where: { |
| 234 | + userId: consumedUser.id, |
| 235 | + }, |
| 236 | + data: { |
| 237 | + userId: survivorUser.id, |
| 238 | + }, |
| 239 | + }) |
| 240 | + await handle.personalMark.updateMany({ |
| 241 | + where: { |
| 242 | + givenById: consumedUser.id, |
| 243 | + }, |
| 244 | + data: { |
| 245 | + givenById: survivorUser.id, |
| 246 | + }, |
| 247 | + }) |
| 248 | + |
| 249 | + // Audit logs |
| 250 | + await handle.auditLog.updateMany({ |
| 251 | + where: { |
| 252 | + userId: consumedUser.id, |
| 253 | + }, |
| 254 | + data: { |
| 255 | + userId: survivorUser.id, |
| 256 | + }, |
| 257 | + }) |
| 258 | + |
| 259 | + // Deregister reasons |
| 260 | + await handle.deregisterReason.updateMany({ |
| 261 | + where: { |
| 262 | + userId: consumedUser.id, |
| 263 | + }, |
| 264 | + data: { |
| 265 | + userId: survivorUser.id, |
| 266 | + }, |
| 267 | + }) |
| 268 | + |
| 269 | + // Notifications (received, created, updated) |
| 270 | + await handle.notificationRecipient.updateMany({ |
| 271 | + where: { |
| 272 | + userId: consumedUser.id, |
| 273 | + }, |
| 274 | + data: { |
| 275 | + userId: survivorUser.id, |
| 276 | + }, |
| 277 | + }) |
| 278 | + await handle.notification.updateMany({ |
| 279 | + where: { |
| 280 | + createdById: consumedUser.id, |
| 281 | + }, |
| 282 | + data: { |
| 283 | + createdById: survivorUser.id, |
| 284 | + }, |
| 285 | + }) |
| 286 | + await handle.notification.updateMany({ |
| 287 | + where: { |
| 288 | + lastUpdatedById: consumedUser.id, |
| 289 | + }, |
| 290 | + data: { |
| 291 | + lastUpdatedById: survivorUser.id, |
| 292 | + }, |
| 293 | + }) |
| 294 | + |
| 295 | + // DELETE ORPHANED RELATIONS |
| 296 | + // If we adopted the consumed user's privacy/notification permissions via |
| 297 | + // the FK backfill, they are already pointing at the survivor. If not, |
| 298 | + // we need to delete the consumed user's orphaned permission records. |
| 299 | + if (consumedUser.privacyPermissionsId !== null && survivorUser.privacyPermissionsId !== null) { |
| 300 | + await handle.privacyPermissions.delete({ |
| 301 | + where: { |
| 302 | + id: consumedUser.privacyPermissionsId, |
| 303 | + }, |
| 304 | + }) |
| 305 | + } |
| 306 | + |
| 307 | + if (consumedUser.notificationPermissionsId !== null && survivorUser.notificationPermissionsId !== null) { |
| 308 | + await handle.notificationPermissions.delete({ |
| 309 | + where: { |
| 310 | + id: consumedUser.notificationPermissionsId, |
| 311 | + }, |
| 312 | + }) |
| 313 | + } |
| 314 | + |
| 315 | + // CONSUME THE USER |
| 316 | + await handle.user.delete({ |
| 317 | + where: { |
| 318 | + id: consumedUser.id, |
| 319 | + }, |
| 320 | + }) |
| 321 | +} |
0 commit comments