You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: aspnetcore/migration/fx-to-core/index.md
-15Lines changed: 0 additions & 15 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -41,23 +41,8 @@ Most non-trivial ASP.NET Framework applications should use incremental migration
41
41
-**[Porting ASP.NET Apps eBook](https://aka.ms/aspnet-porting-ebook)** - Complete reference guide
42
42
-**[eShop Migration Example](/dotnet/architecture/porting-existing-aspnet-apps/example-migration-eshop)** - Real-world case study
43
43
44
-
## Key benefits of ASP.NET Core
45
-
46
-
Understanding these advantages will help justify your migration effort:
47
-
48
-
-**Performance**: Up to 10x faster than ASP.NET Framework
49
-
-**Cross-platform**: Deploy on Windows, Linux, or macOS
50
-
-**Modern features**: Built-in dependency injection, configuration, and logging
51
-
-**Cloud-ready**: Optimized for containers and microservices
52
-
-**Future-proof**: Regular updates and long-term support
53
-
54
44
## Changes to technology areas
55
45
56
46
Before you begin, review the [technical differences between ASP.NET Framework and ASP.NET Core](xref:migration/fx-to-core/areas) to understand key changes that may affect your migration.
57
47
58
-
## What's next?
59
-
60
-
1.**[Review incremental migration](xref:migration/fx-to-core/inc/overview)** - Recommended for most teams
61
-
2.**Choose your application-specific guide** from the table above
0 commit comments