[Net7 to Net9][Controllers to Minimal API] Please update this Doc to current net version and minimal api

[DevTKSS]

Description

if I select on the dropdown above the TOC "net 9" I am getting a fallback to net 7
Seeing that there is currently a update to Controllers -> Minimal API here, could you maybe consider updating this here as well?
Would like to use it for this👍

Page URL

https://learn.microsoft.com/de-de/aspnet/core/blazor/host-and-deploy/webassembly/multiple-hosted-webassembly?view=aspnetcore-7.0&viewFallbackFrom=aspnetcore-9.0&pivots=port-domain

Content source URL

https://github.com/dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs/blob/main/aspnetcore/blazor/host-and-deploy/webassembly/multiple-hosted-webassembly.md

Document ID

43113c1-6326-23f7-07aa-9b1d22967986

Platform Id

37b55444-22be-b444-70cc-9b1faccd217d

Article author

@guardrex

Metadata

• ID: 43113c1-6326-23f7-07aa-9b1d22967986
• PlatformId: 37b55444-22be-b444-70cc-9b1faccd217d
• Service: aspnet-core
• Sub-service: blazor

Related Issues

[github-actions]

🏖️🌞 Summertime!! Woot!! 🏐⛵

Stand-by! ... A green dinosaur 🦖 will be along shortly to assist.

[guardrex]

The product unit (PU) doesn't support this feature at this time. There are product unit issues to consider working on features like this ...

• Support for multiple Blazor Web apps per server project aspnetcore#52216
• Compile time discovery of SSR pages/endpoints for Blazor aspnetcore#46980
• Ability to run multiple Blazor server / Web assembly apps in the same document (micro-frontends) aspnetcore#38128 (specifically about micro-frontends)

To voice your support for an issue, you only need to give it a 👍. They prefer not receiving comments like 'me, too ... I want this.' It generates too many pings from too many comments. They look at the 👍 added to the opening comment to gauge how much general interest there is in a feature request.

I can guess from looking at the demand and backlog that it's highly unlikely that they'll reach those anytime soon. Your best bet is to search the open Internet (e.g., Stack Overflow) for other devs who have worked out a multiple frontend scheme/configuration that works with the existing framework features and API. There might be a way to set it up and get it working. However, we won't be covering it or supporting it outside of just the APIs working.

I'll close this because there's nothing for us to document on this. It isn't currently supported by Microsoft.