diff --git a/aspnetcore/diagnostics/asp0026.md b/aspnetcore/diagnostics/asp0026.md
index bf7e7c51ed18..ddca3fe8ad8c 100644
--- a/aspnetcore/diagnostics/asp0026.md
+++ b/aspnetcore/diagnostics/asp0026.md
@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
 ---
 title: "ASP0026: Analyzer to warn when [Authorize] is overridden by [AllowAnonymous] from 'farther away'" 
-ms.date: 03/27/2025
-description: "Learn about analysis rule ASP0026: [Authorize] is overridden by [AllowAnonymous] from 'farther away'"
+ai-usage: ai-assisted
 author: tdykstra
+description: "Learn about analysis rule ASP0026: [Authorize] is overridden by [AllowAnonymous] from 'farther away'"
 monikerRange: '>= aspnetcore-9.0'
 ms.author: tdykstra
+ms.date: 11/06/2025
 uid: diagnostics/asp0026
 ---
 # ASP0026: `[Authorize]` is overridden by `[AllowAnonymous]` from "farther away"
@@ -19,6 +20,9 @@ uid: diagnostics/asp0026
 
 It seems intuitive that an `[Authorize]` attribute placed "closer" to an MVC action than an `[AllowAnonymous]` attribute would override the `[AllowAnonymous]` attribute and force authorization. However, this is not necessarily the case. What does matter is the relative order of the attributes.
 
+> [!NOTE]
+> The `[AllowAnonymous]` attribute doesn't disable authentication entirely. When credentials are sent to an endpoint with `[AllowAnonymous]`, the endpoint still authenticates those credentials and establishes the user's identity. The `[AllowAnonymous]` attribute only means that authentication is **not required**—the endpoint will run as anonymous only when no credentials are provided. This behavior can be useful for endpoints that need to work for both authenticated and anonymous users.
+
 The following code shows examples where a closer `[Authorize]` attribute gets overridden by an `[AllowAnonymous]` attribute that is farther away.
 
 ```csharp
@@ -58,7 +62,12 @@ public class MyControllerMultiple : ControllerBase
 
 ## Rule description
 
-Warning that an `[Authorize]` attribute is overridden by an `[AllowAnonymous]` attribute from "farther away."
+This warning indicates that an `[Authorize]` attribute is overridden by an `[AllowAnonymous]` attribute from "farther away." When `[AllowAnonymous]` takes precedence, the endpoint doesn't require authentication but still accepts and processes credentials if they're provided. This means:
+
+- If a request includes authentication credentials, the endpoint authenticates the user and makes their identity available.
+- If a request doesn't include credentials, the endpoint allows anonymous access.
+
+This behavior might unintentionally expose endpoints that were meant to require authentication.
 
 ## How to fix violations
 
@@ -70,8 +79,10 @@ public class MyController
 {
     // This produces no warning because the second, "closer" [AllowAnonymous]
     // clarifies that [Authorize] is intentionally overridden.
-    // Specifying AuthenticationSchemes can still be useful
-    // for endpoints that allow but don't require authenticated users.
+    // Specifying AuthenticationSchemes can be useful for endpoints that
+    // allow but don't require authenticated users. When credentials are sent,
+    // they will be authenticated; when no credentials are sent, the endpoint
+    // allows anonymous access.
     [Authorize(AuthenticationSchemes = "Cookies")]
     [AllowAnonymous]
     public IActionResult Privacy() => null;
diff --git a/aspnetcore/release-notes/aspnetcore-9/includes/asp0026.md b/aspnetcore/release-notes/aspnetcore-9/includes/asp0026.md
index 6985c4b985ad..ceef60e60e3a 100644
--- a/aspnetcore/release-notes/aspnetcore-9/includes/asp0026.md
+++ b/aspnetcore/release-notes/aspnetcore-9/includes/asp0026.md
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
 
 It seems intuitive that an `[Authorize]` attribute placed "closer" to an MVC action than an `[AllowAnonymous]` attribute would override the `[AllowAnonymous]` attribute and force authorization. However, this is not necessarily the case. What does matter is the relative order of the attributes.
 
+> [!NOTE]
+> The `[AllowAnonymous]` attribute doesn't disable authentication entirely. When credentials are sent to an endpoint with `[AllowAnonymous]`, the endpoint still authenticates those credentials and establishes the user's identity. The `[AllowAnonymous]` attribute only means that authentication is **not required**—the endpoint will run as anonymous only when no credentials are provided. This behavior can be useful for endpoints that need to work for both authenticated and anonymous users.
+
 The following code shows examples where a closer `[Authorize]` attribute gets overridden by an `[AllowAnonymous]` attribute that is farther away.
 
 ```csharp
@@ -53,8 +56,10 @@ public class MyController
 {
     // This produces no warning because the second, "closer" [AllowAnonymous]
     // clarifies that [Authorize] is intentionally overridden.
-    // Specifying AuthenticationSchemes can still be useful
-    // for endpoints that allow but don't require authenticated users.
+    // Specifying AuthenticationSchemes can be useful for endpoints that
+    // allow but don't require authenticated users. When credentials are sent,
+    // they will be authenticated; when no credentials are sent, the endpoint
+    // allows anonymous access.
     [Authorize(AuthenticationSchemes = "Cookies")]
     [AllowAnonymous]
     public IActionResult Privacy() => null;