Replies: 1 comment
-
very good case, we also work with the same setup, but I found that aspire is not supporting multi-repos yet |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Multi-Repository Setup with .NET Aspire: Best Practices for Enterprise Constraints
🎯 Problem Statement
I'm planning to use .NET Aspire for a new project, but I'm facing architectural challenges due to enterprise constraints imposed by our client. I'd like to discuss the best approach for handling this scenario.
🏢 Current Environment & Constraints
As a consulting company working for a large enterprise, we have the following mandatory requirements:
Dockerfile
Dockerfile
contentdevelop
branch → Pipeline triggers → Helm deployment to dev cluster💡 Proposed Solution
To work with .NET Aspire under these constraints, I'm considering:
AppHost
projectServiceDefaults
projectWhen implementing this approach, I'm encountering the following problems:
1. Pipeline Failures
Dockerfile
that doesn't existDockerfile
itself2. Manual Configuration Overhead
Dockerfile
manually for each service, do I need to manually configure all environment variables?3. Environment Variable Management
🤔 Questions for the Community
Best Practices: What's the recommended approach for handling .NET Aspire in a multi-repository, enterprise-constrained environment?
Dockerfile Generation:
Environment Variables:
Existing Solutions:
🔍 What I'm Looking For
📋 Technical Details
Any insights, experiences, or recommendations would be greatly appreciated! 🙏
Tags:
aspire
,multi-repository
,enterprise
,docker
,azure
,kubernetes
,gitlab-ci
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions