Skip to content

RequestDelegateGenerator should use case-insensitive parsing for enum route parametersย #52497

@austindrenski

Description

@austindrenski

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Describe the bug

RequestDelegateGenerator should use case-insensitive parsing for enum route parameters.

This has been brought up before, most recently by @aradalvand in #48346, but those previous issues were treated as opportunities for future extensibility, whereas I would like to make the case that this is a bug with user-facing impact well-documented pinch point that should be easy to patch in a post-RDG world.

My tinfoil hat thesis is that this is one of those long-lingering, little frictions that causes far more grief than ever gets reported because it's easy enough to work around, but enums are a first-class primitive and they deserve better support out-of-the-box, especially with the advent of RDG for minimal APIs.

Argument 1: prior art from other primitives with lenient default parsing rules

Enums (unfortunately) didn't receive the same IParsable<T> treatment for net8.0 as other first-class primitives, which means that RDG has to make a choice about which overload of Enum.TryParse(...) to call, as opposed to delegating to IParsable<T>.TryParse(...).

But if we look around at how IParsable<T> was implemented/delegated for other primitives, we can find examples erring on the side of more lenient parsing rules by default.

For example, here are the first few lines of the implementation for IParsable<bool>.TryParse(...):

public static bool TryParse(ReadOnlySpan<char> value, out bool result)
{
    // Boolean.{Try}Parse allows for optional whitespace/null values before and
    // after the case-insensitive "true"/"false", but we don't expect those to
    // be the common case. We check for "true"/"false" case-insensitive in the
    // fast, inlined call path, and then only if neither match do we fall back
    // to trimming and making a second post-trimming attempt at matching those
    // same strings.

While there's nothing to stop anyone from chaotically defining enum members that differ only in casing, it's a broadly respected convention (backed on Roslyn analyzers) for .NET enums to have members whose names differ by more than case.

Further, .NET enums broadly follow the same conventions as other .NET types, meaning the gross majority of (normal) enums in the wild are defined in PascalCase. This means that any use of an enum in a RDG-generated handler will suffer from the unexpected case-sensitivity demonstrated below in Argument 3.

(I anticipate and respect the quibble that this shouldn't be unexpected, since its well-documented, but if minimal APIs are about making .NET easy to work with out-of-the-box, then it's still a problem worth solving.)

Argument 2: RDG has enough context to decide when case-sensitivity makes sense

The web is case-insensitive.
The web should be case-insensitive.
The web was, is, and always shall be a place of chaos, but we still deserve sensible happy-path defaults.

It makes sense to use case-sensitive enum parsing by default for things like query strings, request bodies, etc. However, it makes much less sense to do the same in places like path segments, headers, etc.

RDG should have enough context available to generate case-insensitive parsing for path parameters without having to do so for non-path parameters.

Argument 3: the rest of the routing stack treats path segments as case-insensitive

var builder = WebApplication.CreateSlimBuilder(args);

var app = builder.Build();

app.MapGet("hello/{enum}/world", static (SomeEnum @enum) => Results.Ok());

app.Run();

enum SomeEnum
{
    None,
    Some
}
$ curl -i http://localhost:5000/hello/None/world
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
$ curl -i http://localhost:5000/HELLO/None/world
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
$ curl -i http://localhost:5000/HELLO/None/WORLD
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
$ curl -i http://localhost:5000/hello/none/world
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request

The real-world question I received today was: "why is only part of this URL case-sensitive?"

The answer was immediately obvious, because I already knew better than to use raw enums in route templates, but I still managed to walk right into it for the umpteenth time. (...and again, I have a sneaking suspicion that I can't be the only one repeatedly stubbing their toes on this.)

Culprit

// If we are parsable we need to emit code based on the enumeration ParsabilityMethod which has a bunch of members
// which spell out the preferred TryParse usage. This switch statement makes slight variations to them based on
// which method was encountered.
Func<string, string, string>? preferredTryParseInvocation = parsabilityMethod switch
{
ParsabilityMethod.IParsable => (string inputArgument, string outputArgument) => $$"""GeneratedRouteBuilderExtensionsCore.TryParseExplicit<{{parameterType.ToDisplayString(SymbolDisplayFormat.FullyQualifiedFormat)}}>({{inputArgument}}!, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, out var {{outputArgument}})""",
ParsabilityMethod.TryParseWithFormatProvider => (string inputArgument, string outputArgument) => $$"""{{parameterType.ToDisplayString(SymbolDisplayFormat.FullyQualifiedFormat)}}.TryParse({{inputArgument}}!, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, out var {{outputArgument}})""",
ParsabilityMethod.TryParse => (string inputArgument, string outputArgument) => $$"""{{parameterType.ToDisplayString(SymbolDisplayFormat.FullyQualifiedFormat)}}.TryParse({{inputArgument}}!, out var {{outputArgument}})""",
ParsabilityMethod.Enum => (string inputArgument, string outputArgument) => $$"""Enum.TryParse<{{parameterType.ToDisplayString(SymbolDisplayFormat.FullyQualifiedFormat)}}>({{inputArgument}}!, out var {{outputArgument}})""",
ParsabilityMethod.Uri => (string inputArgument, string outputArgument) => $$"""Uri.TryCreate({{inputArgument}}!, UriKind.RelativeOrAbsolute, out var {{outputArgument}})""",
ParsabilityMethod.String => null, // string parameters don't require parsing
_ => throw new NotImplementedException($"Unreachable! Unexpected {nameof(ParsabilityMethod)}: {parsabilityMethod}"),
};

Related

Expected Behavior

var builder = WebApplication.CreateSlimBuilder(args);

var app = builder.Build();

app.MapGet("hello/{enum}/world", static (SomeEnum @enum) => Results.Ok());

app.Run();

enum SomeEnum
{
    None,
    Some
}
$ curl -i http://localhost:5000/hello/none/world
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
$ curl -i http://localhost:5000/HELLO/NONE/WORLD
HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Steps To Reproduce

Exceptions (if any)

No response

.NET Version

8.0.100

Anything else?

No response

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    area-minimalIncludes minimal APIs, endpoint filters, parameter binding, request delegate generator etcfeature-rdg

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions