Skip to content

Conversation

@pwuexec
Copy link
Contributor

@pwuexec pwuexec commented Sep 20, 2024

Remove unnecessary if statements in TFA validation logic

  • You've read the Contributor Guide and Code of Conduct.
  • You've included unit or integration tests for your change, where applicable.
  • You've included inline docs for your change, where applicable.
  • There's an open issue for the PR that you are making. If you'd like to propose a new feature or change, please open an issue to discuss the change or find an existing issue.

Summary of the changes: Remove unnecessary if statements in TFA validation

Description

This pull request simplifies the Two-Factor Authentication (TFA) validation logic in ASP.NET Core Identity by removing unnecessary if statements. The main change is:

  1. Removed the redundant else if statements, replacing them with direct if checks.

This change offers the following benefits:

  • Improved readability: The code is now more straightforward and easier to follow.
  • Reduced nesting: Eliminating the else statements reduces the complexity of the code structure.
  • Better performance: The code now avoids unnecessary condition checks.

The modification does not alter the existing functionality or error messages. It simply removes redundant conditional statements to make the code more efficient.

@ghost ghost added the area-identity Includes: Identity and providers label Sep 20, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Sep 20, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the pending-ci-rerun When assigned to a PR indicates that the CI checks should be rerun label Sep 28, 2024
@halter73
Copy link
Member

/azp run

@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed the pending-ci-rerun When assigned to a PR indicates that the CI checks should be rerun label Oct 11, 2024
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

Copy link
Member

@halter73 halter73 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When I wrote this, I figured the else if made it extra clear that only one branch would be taken even though it's redundant, but I don't feel that strongly. Thanks for making your first contribution! What got you looking at this code?

@halter73 halter73 enabled auto-merge (squash) October 11, 2024 00:37
@halter73 halter73 merged commit 17487a1 into dotnet:main Oct 11, 2024
27 checks passed
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added this to the 10.0-preview1 milestone Oct 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area-identity Includes: Identity and providers community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants