Skip to content
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
<title>ComponentsWebAssembly-CSharp</title>
<base href="/" />
<link rel="preload" id="webassembly" />
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dotnet-wasm ? dotnet-webassembly ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think changing the name would require changing the SDK side too. If we don't feel strongly about naming, I think going with webassembly is fine. (It's also more consistent with what we use elsewhere, where we just use webassembly if that helps)

Copy link
Member Author

@maraf maraf Apr 11, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This name already landed in different PR for "hosted" mode.
I probably wouldn't prefer dotnet- prefix as everything here is dotnet.
Whether wasm or webassembly is up for discussion.

<!--#if SampleContent -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="lib/bootstrap/dist/css/bootstrap.min.css" />
<!--#endif -->
Expand Down
Loading