Improvement of comparison operator

[andrey-messi]

/// <summary>
/// Check if var2 exceeds var1 and they don't exceed bounds
/// </summary>
public static bool Check(int var1, int var2)
{
	int maxLimit = 10;
	int minLimitStrict = 1;
	return (minLimitStrict < var2 && var2 < var1 && var1 <= maxLimit);
}

It would be more convinient to use
(minLimitStrict < var2 < var1 <= maxLimit)
instead of
(minLimitStrict < var2 && var2 < var1 && var1 <= maxLimit)

I know that here a compiler firstly evaluates first comparison operator (minLimitStrict < var2) and returns bool, so code:
(minLimitStrict < var2 < var1 <= maxLimit)
is not valid now.
But maybe it is possible to change a compiler's behavior and obligate to use parentheses when expected to return bool.
Or if it is not possible (for example for not breaking existing thirt-party code base), then it will be good to introduce new operators, for example <* and <=* :
(minLimitStrict <* var2 <* var1 <=* maxLimit)

[ufcpp]

dup of #217 #847
related to #420

[jnm2]

Honestly if I had a dollar for every time I could have used this in C#, I'd be making about $3/year.

[bondsbw]

Honestly if I had a dollar for every time I could have used this in C#, I'd be making about $3/year.

If you've been using C# since the beginning, then you might have used this 50 times already. There are several "really useful" C# features I've used less than that over my career.