Idea: Remove the requirements for (implicit) converters to be public

[AdmiralSnyder]

it would be nice if implicit converters (or converters in general) could be declared non-public i.e. private, protected or internal.
Since it's possible to convert from ValueTuples, this gives the opportunity to make sourcecode much denser for often-used conversions, but it would be nice to restrict the usage of those converters for library-internal use.

my specific usecase is for parameter-collection classes where i convert refactor a call from
GetDbObjs(new DbObjCreateArgs<Class>(Applic, Db))
to
GetDbObjs((Applic, Db))

I'd like to be able to restrict the usage of those converters to the scopes i want to.

[YairHalberstadt]

Target typed new would allow:

GetDbObjs(new(Applic, Db))

[AdmiralSnyder]

if we only had Target typed new already...

[YairHalberstadt]

@AdmiralSnyder

Target typed new is scheduled for 8.1, and will almost certainly be released before this feature.

[AdmiralSnyder]

this should be noted in here perhaps:
https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/72a4daa8532e191858f9f887f4c8d280ec006bb4/proposals/target-typed-new.md

[YairHalberstadt]

What should be noted in there?

[333fred]

Small nit: @AdmiralSnyder you mean conversions, not converters.