-
|
Currently we have a lot of "placeholder proposals". Could we replace them with at least incomplete specification. Why are those propsoal approved without a spec - or where is the spec? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 8 replies
-
|
The only things still missing are C# 7 features (and possibly one or two small C# 8 features), and specification work is ongoing for them on https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/tree/draft-v7. For the ones that have nothing yet, there isn't a specification. Yes, we should have done a better job at creating speclets for these features, but that this point the process of creating them is the process that is going on at the dotnet/csharpstandard repo, being led by the ECMA committee. Also @BillWagner, if he wants to add anything here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for your answer. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We're tracking progress on features in two files / branches in the csharpstandard repo. The issues with the type: feature label may also be helpful. For the roadmap, once we've finished all the features for C# 6, I'll make a PR to change the source for the C# spec on docs.microsoft.com to the updated standard. After that, we'll start publishing from the latest versions as content is available. As @333fred mentioned, we know we got into this state, and we're working to dig ourselves out from the technical debt incurred. It will take time, and we understand your frustration and appreciate your patience. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I may be misunderstanding what you mean by |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I mean for example: link |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ref local reassignment is the language feature that enables that example. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I mean the spec for: https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-7.3/ref-loops.md See: https://docs.microsoft.com/de-de/dotnet/csharp/language-reference/keywords/foreach-in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ahh. Yes, we do have to recreate the spec from a variety of LDM decisions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
The only things still missing are C# 7 features (and possibly one or two small C# 8 features), and specification work is ongoing for them on https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/tree/draft-v7. For the ones that have nothing yet, there isn't a specification. Yes, we should have done a better job at creating speclets for these features, but that this point the process of creating them is the process that is going on at the dotnet/csharpstandard repo, being led by the ECMA committee. Also @BillWagner, if he wants to add anything here.