nullable constraint

[ghost]

public T Null<T>() where T : nullable
{
    return null;
}

string someName1 = Null<string>();
int? someName2 = Null<int?>();

---

I was wrong.

[cheong00]

I think you should be putting null into nullable variables instead of corresponding nullable types.

Otherwise what's the point of creating nullables at all? Shouldn't making to magic value to every type be enough?

[huoyaoyuan]

null of reference types and null of nullable value types are totally different things in IL.

[CyrusNajmabadi]

I'm missing something. First, I don't think you need generics here. However, if you want a generic method here, it would be:

T Default<T>() => default;

This will give you null for both string and int?. But, as you can see from the method body, this method is not necessary and you can just use default or default(T)