Allow record and struct/class to be specified in the opposite order

[DavidArno]

Currently, if I want to create a class record, I can specify it as:

record R();

But if I want to qualify it as a class record, or specify a struct record, I have to put that modifier after the record:

record struct R1();
record class R2();

The other modifiers though come before record:

internal readonly partial record struct R();

I would like to be able to put struct and class before record as they are - to my mind at least - modifiers of the record type, rather than record being a modifier to the class or struct. So I'd like a future version of the compiler to support any order for struct/class and record.

[HaloFour]

IIRC with the addition of struct records it was seen that record was a modifier to the type and not vice versa, although that makes little sense to me that you can omit class for record class.

[alrz]

There is no crying emoji reaction.