@value works equivalently to value keyword

[osamakawish]

Not sure if this is a bug or issue to be reported or fixed. But it's a little annoying when I try to set a variable name to @value, and the property in the setter does nothing different and effectively treats it as if it's value.

Basically this:

private int @value;
public int Value { get => @value; set => value = @value; }

causes issues. Code is a bit more complicated than above though, but it's the simplest example I could come up with.

[svick]

Per the spec, value is not technically a keyword:

The implicit parameter of a set accessor is always named value.

This means your setter basically behaves as if it was a method with the signature public void SetValue(int value) and you can't use @value to refer to the field in such a method either. You can use this.value, though:

private int value;
public int Value { get => value; set => this.value = value; }

[jnm2]

(The same is also true for the implicit args parameter in top-level programs)