From 554a94dd43e5633760350866fa49fa957e9c31e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Joost W. Morsink" <morsink@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 16:06:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix comment about complexity ImmutableArray`1.ToBuilder
 method

The operation is O(n) instead of O(1), because it copies all the elements to the builder.
---
 xml/System.Collections.Immutable/ImmutableArray`1.xml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/xml/System.Collections.Immutable/ImmutableArray`1.xml b/xml/System.Collections.Immutable/ImmutableArray`1.xml
index f8aa8c6f96e..75dc739df0a 100644
--- a/xml/System.Collections.Immutable/ImmutableArray`1.xml
+++ b/xml/System.Collections.Immutable/ImmutableArray`1.xml
@@ -3688,7 +3688,7 @@ This member is an explicit interface member implementation. It can be used only
           <format type="text/markdown"><![CDATA[  
   
 ## Remarks  
- This is an O(1) operation and results in only a single (small) memory allocation. The mutable list that is returned is not thread-safe.  
+ This is an O(n) operation and copies all the elements of the immutable array into the Builder. The mutable list that is returned is not thread-safe.  
   
  ]]></format>
         </remarks>