feat(Cascader): remove EditorRequired attribute

[ArgoZhang]

remove EditorRequired attribute

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

简单描述你更改了什么, 不超过80个字符；如果有关联 Issue 请在下方填写相关编号

Description

fixes #5183

Regression?

• Yes
• No

[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]

[是否影响老版本]

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

[Justify the selection above]

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Remove the EditorRequired attribute from the Items parameter of the Cascader component.

Bug Fixes:

• Fixes feat(Cascader): make the Items attribute virtual or remove the [EditorRequired] attribute on it #5183

Enhancements:

• Removed the unnecessary EditorRequired attribute.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

The EditorRequired attribute was removed from the Items parameter of the Cascader component. This change makes the Items parameter optional.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Removed the EditorRequired attribute from the Items parameter of the Cascader component.	Removed the [EditorRequired] attribute from the Items property.	src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Cascader/Cascader.razor.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#5183	Remove the [EditorRequired] attribute from the Items property in the Cascader component	✅
#5183	Resolve the IDE warning when using the Cascader component without explicitly setting Items	✅

Possibly linked issues

• feat(Cascader): make the Items attribute virtual or remove the [EditorRequired] attribute on it #5183: The PR fixes issue feat(Cascader): make the Items attribute virtual or remove the [EditorRequired] attribute on it #5183 by removing the EditorRequired attribute, addressing the problem of the required attribute not working.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
• Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
  an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Please provide the rationale for removing the EditorRequired attribute. This is a breaking change that could affect component usage patterns.
• The PR template is incomplete - please fill out the risk assessment and verification sections to help reviewers understand the impact of this change.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (bccd8da) to head (b4a48a6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #5184   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          634       634           
  Lines        28158     28158           
  Branches      4052      4052           
=========================================
  Hits         28158     28158           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.