Skip to content

Conversation

@ArgoZhang
Copy link
Member

@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang commented Jun 22, 2025

Link issues

fixes #6276

Summary By Copilot

Regression?

  • Yes
  • No

Risk

  • High
  • Medium
  • Low

Verification

  • Manual (required)
  • Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

  • Yes
  • No
  • N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

  • Doc is updated/provided or not needed
  • Demo is updated/provided or not needed
  • Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Refactor the TCP socket factory API to use named identifiers and IPEndPoint parameters, add a convenient extension overload, and update tests to reflect these changes

New Features:

  • Introduce a GetOrCreate extension method that accepts a name, IP address string, and port

Enhancements:

  • Refactor ITcpSocketFactory to key clients by a unique name and IPEndPoint instead of host/port pair
  • Update DefaultTcpSocketFactory implementation to use the new named endpoint overloads for client creation and removal

Tests:

  • Adjust existing socket factory tests to use the new overloads and add a test for invalid port range in Utility.ConvertToIpEndPoint

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Jun 22, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

Refactors the socket factory to identify clients by name and use IPEndPoint for endpoint definition, updating interface signatures, default implementation logic, unit tests, and adding an extension to convert IP/port into IPEndPoint.

Class diagram for refactored ITcpSocketFactory and extension

classDiagram
    class ITcpSocketFactory {
        +ITcpSocketClient GetOrCreate(string name, IPEndPoint endPoint)
        +ITcpSocketClient? Remove(string name)
    }
    class DefaultTcpSocketFactory {
        +ITcpSocketClient GetOrCreate(string name, IPEndPoint endPoint)
        +ITcpSocketClient? Remove(string name)
        -ConcurrentDictionary<string, ITcpSocketClient> _pool
    }
    class ITcpSocketFactoryExtensions {
        +static ITcpSocketClient GetOrCreate(ITcpSocketFactory factory, string name, string ipAddress, int port)
    }
    ITcpSocketFactory <|.. DefaultTcpSocketFactory
    ITcpSocketFactoryExtensions ..> ITcpSocketFactory : extension
    DefaultTcpSocketFactory o-- ITcpSocketClient
    ITcpSocketFactoryExtensions ..> Utility : uses
    class Utility {
        +static IPEndPoint ConvertToIpEndPoint(string ipAddress, int port)
    }
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Switch ITcpSocketFactory API to named clients with IPEndPoint
  • Import IPEndPoint namespace
  • Replace GetOrCreate(host,port) signature with GetOrCreate(name,IPEndPoint)
  • Update Remove signature to accept name only
  • Revise XML comments accordingly
src/BootstrapBlazor/Services/TcpSocket/ITcpSocketFactory.cs
Adapt DefaultTcpSocketFactory to new interface
  • Change GetOrCreate key from “host:port” to name
  • Accept IPEndPoint parameter instead of host/port
  • Remove internal endpoint conversion
  • Update Remove to use name-based key
src/BootstrapBlazor/Services/TcpSocket/DefaultTcpSocketFactory.cs
Update unit tests for renamed parameters and error cases
  • Change factory calls to include name, host/ip, port
  • Adjust Remove calls to use name
  • Add negative port assertion in UtilityTest
test/UnitTest/Services/TcpSocketFactoryTest.cs
test/UnitTest/Utils/UtilityTest.cs
Add GetOrCreate extension for IP string conversion
  • Create ITcpSocketFactoryExtensions class
  • Implement GetOrCreate(name,ipAddress,port) calling Utility.ConvertToIpEndPoint
  • Annotate with UnsupportedOSPlatform("browser")
src/BootstrapBlazor/Extensions/ITcpSocketFactoryExtensions.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue Objective Addressed Explanation
#6276 Add a GetOrCreate extension method to the ITcpSocketFactory interface.

Possibly linked issues


Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@bb-auto bb-auto bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 22, 2025
@bb-auto bb-auto bot added this to the 9.7.0 milestone Jun 22, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location> `src/BootstrapBlazor/Services/TcpSocket/DefaultTcpSocketFactory.cs:19` </location>
<code_context>
     private readonly ConcurrentDictionary<string, ITcpSocketClient> _pool = new();

-    public ITcpSocketClient GetOrCreate(string host, int port = 0)
+    public ITcpSocketClient GetOrCreate(string name, IPEndPoint endPoint)
     {
-        return _pool.GetOrAdd($"{host}:{port}", key =>
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
Potential for name and endpoint mismatch leading to unexpected client reuse.

Since the client pool uses only 'name' as the key, using the same name with different endpoints will always return the client for the first endpoint. This may cause unexpected behavior if the endpoint is expected to be unique. Please document this clearly or enforce unique name-endpoint pairs.
</issue_to_address>

### Comment 2
<location> `test/UnitTest/Services/TcpSocketFactoryTest.cs:39` </location>
<code_context>
+        var client4 = factory.GetOrCreate("demo2", "256.0.0.1", 0);

-        var client5 = factory.Remove("256.0.0.1", 0);
+        var client5 = factory.Remove("demo2");
         Assert.Equal(client4, client5);
         Assert.NotNull(client5);
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
Missing test for Remove with non-existent or invalid names.

Add tests for Remove when called with non-existent names, null, or empty strings to ensure it returns null and handles these cases without exceptions.
</issue_to_address>

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (0caed5a) to head (3163039).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main     #6277   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   99.99%   100.00%           
========================================
  Files         712       713    +1     
  Lines       31397     31400    +3     
  Branches     4437      4437           
========================================
+ Hits        31396     31400    +4     
+ Partials        1         0    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
BB 100.00% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang merged commit 556fcf3 into main Jun 22, 2025
6 checks passed
@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang deleted the feat-create branch June 22, 2025 11:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

refactor(ITcpSocketFactory): add GetOrCreate extension method

2 participants