Replies: 3 comments
-
Proportional # of tokens staked => Less damage from bankruptcies |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
As a counterpoint: a rational actor staking into the Insurance Fund is showing that they believe in the security of Drift Protocol so they kinda would have to "give a shit" about Drift. Insurance Fund stakers are providing value to the protocol by taking on risks if Drift gets hacked or becomes insolvent. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
The IF makes the protocol healthier so there is no need to gate it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
2 possible ideas regarding IF participants:
Token gated: Currently, anyone is able to stake into the Insurance Fund, whether they're active users of Drift or not, or whether they give a shit about Drift or not tbh lol. Perhaps if there was some implementation of a token whereby the more tokens you hold leads to a greater allowance for staking into the IF, this could create some nice incentives.
Based on trading volume: Perhaps some ratio of trading volume grants you allowance to stake into the IF. Probably less than 1:1 ratio since leverage is readily available, and/or take into account average volume over X amount of days. Other metrics can be considered too of course.
I think there's potential for either or both of these ideas to flywheel things harder! But keep in mind these suggestions are coming from someone who is severely redacted 🫡 so I'm sure there's better ideas floating around!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions