| title |
|---|
Profiler Guide |
The Dynamo Profiler analyzes model inference performance and generates optimized deployment configurations (DynamoGraphDeployments). Given a model, hardware, and SLA targets, it determines the best parallelization strategy, selects optimal prefill and decode engine configurations, and produces a ready-to-deploy DGD YAML.
The profiler accepts a DynamoGraphDeploymentRequestSpec (DGDR) as input and uses AI Configurator (AIC) for performance simulation, candidate enumeration, and configuration picking. When the planner is enabled, the profiler additionally generates engine interpolation curves used for runtime autoscaling.
- What model you want to deploy (
model) - How it should perform (SLA targets:
sla.ttft,sla.itl) - Where it should run (optional GPU preferences via
hardware) - Which backend to use (
backend: auto, vllm, sglang, or trtllm) - Which image to use (
image)
The profiler follows this pipeline:
flowchart TD
Input["DGDR Spec"] --> Validate["Validate + Gate Checks"]
Validate --> Strategy{searchStrategy?}
Strategy -->|rapid| AICCheck{"AIC supports\nmodel/hw/backend?"}
Strategy -->|thorough| Enumerate["Enumerate candidates\nvia AIC"]
AICCheck -->|yes| Simulate["AIC Simulation\n+ Picking"]
AICCheck -->|no| Naive["Naive Config\nGeneration"]
Enumerate --> Deploy["Deploy + Benchmark\neach candidate"]
Deploy --> Pick["AIC Picking"]
Simulate --> DGDGen["DGD Generation"]
Pick --> DGDGen
Naive --> DGDGen
DGDGen --> Interpolation["Interpolation\nCurves"]
Interpolation --> MockerCheck{mocker?}
MockerCheck -->|yes| MockerBase["generate_mocker_config()"]
MockerCheck -->|no| PlannerCheck
MockerBase --> PlannerCheck{planner?}
PlannerCheck -->|yes| AddPlanner["add_planner_to_config()"]
PlannerCheck -->|no| ProfileCheck
AddPlanner --> ProfileCheck{"needs profile data?\n(mocker or throughput\nplanner enabled)"}
ProfileCheck -->|yes| AddProfile["add_profile_data_to_config()"]
ProfileCheck -->|no| Final
AddProfile --> Final["final_config.yaml"]
-
Validation: The DGDR spec is validated — required fields checked (
image,hardware.gpuSku,hardware.numGpusPerNode), SLA targets verified, and gate checks applied (see Gate Checks). -
Search Strategy: The profiler branches based on
searchStrategy:- Rapid: Uses AIC simulation to estimate performance across parallelization configs. No GPUs needed, completes in ~30 seconds.
- Thorough: Enumerates candidate parallelization configs via AIC, deploys each on real GPUs, benchmarks with AIPerf, then picks the best. Takes 2-4 hours, disagg mode only.
-
Picking: The profiler selects the best configuration using one of three modes, determined automatically from the DGDR spec (see Picking Modes).
-
DGD Generation: The picked configuration is rendered into a complete DGD YAML via AIC's generator pipeline, including correct parallelization, replica counts, container image, and PVC mounts.
-
Interpolation (throughput planner/mocker): When the planner is enabled, the profiler generates detailed performance interpolation curves — TTFT vs ISL for prefill, ITL vs KV-cache utilization for decode. These are stored as NPZ files and later packaged into a ConfigMap during final assembly.
-
Final Assembly (3 composable layers):
- Mocker base: If mocker is enabled, the base DGD is swapped for the mocker DGD template (
generate_mocker_config). Otherwise the AIC-picked DGD is kept. - Planner service: If the planner is enabled, the Planner pod and its planner-config ConfigMap are injected into the DGD (
add_planner_to_config). - Profile data: If mocker is enabled or planner throughput-based scaling is enabled, the interpolation data ConfigMap is created and mounted into all consumers — the Planner service and/or mocker workers (
add_profile_data_to_config).
The result is written to
final_config.yaml. - Mocker base: If mocker is enabled, the base DGD is swapped for the mocker DGD template (
Uses AIC's performance simulation to estimate optimal configurations without deploying real engines. Completes in ~30 seconds.
searchStrategy: rapid- Supports all backends: vLLM, SGLang, TensorRT-LLM
- If the model/hardware/backend combination is not supported by AIC, falls back to a naive config (memory-fit TP calculation)
- No GPU resources consumed during profiling
Enumerates candidate parallelization configs, deploys each as a real K8s workload, and benchmarks with AIPerf.
searchStrategy: thorough- Only disaggregated mode is supported
- Does not support
autobackend — specifyvllm,sglang, ortrtllm - Takes 2-4 hours depending on the number of candidates
- Provides highest accuracy since measurements come from real hardware
The profiler automatically selects a picking mode based on the DGDR spec:
Triggered when the planner is enabled (scaling enabled in features.planner). Picks prefill and decode engines independently, each with 1 replica. The planner handles scaling at runtime.
Triggered when a target load is specified (workload.requestRate or workload.concurrency). Finds the configuration that serves the target load with the minimum number of GPUs under SLA.
workload:
requestRate: 5.0 # target 5 req/sTriggered when there is no planner and no target load. Maximizes throughput for the available GPU budget under SLA.
When the planner is enabled, the profiler generates engine interpolation data needed for throughput-based autoscaling. The pre_deployment_sweeping_mode field controls how this data is produced:
features:
planner:
pre_deployment_sweeping_mode: rapid # rapid | thorough | none
enable_throughput_scaling: true- rapid: Uses AIC simulation to generate interpolation curves (~30s, no GPUs)
- thorough: Deploys the selected engine config on real GPUs and sweeps across ISL/concurrency ranges (2-4h)
- none: Skips interpolation. Only valid when using load-based scaling without throughput-based scaling.
The profiler saves two ConfigMaps into the generated DGD:
- planner-config-XXXX: Serialized
PlannerConfigJSON (withprofile_results_dirpointing to the profiling data mount) - planner-profile-data-XXXX: Prefill and decode interpolation data (JSON)
See the Planner Guide for the full PlannerConfig reference.
When features.mocker.enabled: true, the profiler outputs a mocker DGD that simulates engine behavior without real GPUs. This is useful for testing planner behavior and validating configurations at scale.
Mocker requires pre-deployment sweeping to generate simulated performance profiles — pre_deployment_sweeping_mode cannot be none when mocker is enabled.
The profiler enforces these rules at startup:
| Condition | Behavior |
|---|---|
searchStrategy: thorough + backend: auto |
Rejected. Specify a concrete backend. |
AIC unsupported + enable_throughput_scaling: true |
Rejected. Throughput planner requires AIC support. |
AIC unsupported + pre_deployment_sweeping_mode: rapid |
Falls back to none with a warning. |
e2eLatency provided without ttft: null, itl: null |
Rejected by SLA validator. When using e2eLatency, explicitly null out ttft and itl. |
| SLA unachievable | Warning logged, SLA updated to best achievable value. |
| Load-match needs more GPUs than available | Warning logged. |
| Backend | Dense Models | MoE Models |
|---|---|---|
| vLLM | ✅ | 🚧 |
| SGLang | ✅ | ✅ |
| TensorRT-LLM | ✅ | 🚧 |
The profiler sweeps over the following parallelization mappings for prefill and decode:
| Model Architecture | Prefill Parallelization Mapping | Decode Parallelization Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| MLA+MoE (DeepseekV3ForCausalLM, DeepseekV32ForCausalLM) | TEP, DEP | TEP, DEP |
| GQA+MoE (Qwen3MoeForCausalLM) | TP, TEP, DEP | TP, TEP, DEP |
| Other Models | TP | TP |
Note
Exact model x parallelization mapping support is dependent on the backend. The profiler does not guarantee that the recommended P/D engine configuration is supported and bug-free by the backend.
The recommended deployment method is through DGDRs. Sample configurations are provided in components/src/dynamo/profiler/deploy/:
| Sample | Description |
|---|---|
profile_sla_dgdr.yaml |
Standard online profiling with AIPerf |
profile_sla_aic_dgdr.yaml |
Fast offline profiling with AI Configurator |
profile_sla_moe_dgdr.yaml |
MoE model profiling (SGLang) |
Each DGDR requires a container image for profiling and deployment:
image(Optional): Container image for the profiling job. Must contain the profiler code and dependencies.
spec:
image: "nvcr.io/nvidia/ai-dynamo/vllm-runtime:0.9.0"Step 1: Create Your DGDR
Use a sample configuration or create your own:
apiVersion: nvidia.com/v1beta1
kind: DynamoGraphDeploymentRequest
metadata:
name: my-model-profiling
spec:
model: "Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B"
backend: vllm
image: "nvcr.io/nvidia/ai-dynamo/dynamo-frontend:1.0.0"Step 2: Apply the DGDR
export NAMESPACE=your-namespace
kubectl apply -f my-profiling-dgdr.yaml -n $NAMESPACEStep 3: Monitor Progress
# View status
kubectl get dgdr -n $NAMESPACE
# Detailed status
kubectl describe dgdr my-model-profiling -n $NAMESPACE
# Watch profiling job logs
kubectl logs -f job/profile-my-model-profiling -n $NAMESPACEDGDR Status Phases:
Pending: Initial state, preparing to profileProfiling: Running profiling job (20-30 seconds for AIC, 2-4 hours for online)Ready: Profiling complete, generated DGD spec available in statusDeploying: Generating and applying DGD configurationDeployed: DGD successfully deployed and runningFailed: Error occurred (check events for details)
Step 4: Access Your Deployment
# Find the frontend service
kubectl get svc -n $NAMESPACE | grep frontend
# Port-forward to access locally
kubectl port-forward svc/<deployment>-frontend 8000:8000 -n $NAMESPACE
# Test the endpoint
curl http://localhost:8000/v1/modelsNote
DGDRs are immutable. To update SLAs or configuration, delete the existing DGDR and create a new one.
The profiler follows a 5-step process:
- Hardware Setup: Uses defaults or user-specified hardware configuration. Optionally, cluster-scoped operators can enable automatic GPU discovery to detect specifications from cluster nodes.
- Identify Sweep Ranges: Automatically determine minimum and maximum number of GPUs per engine. Minimum is determined by the model size and GPU VRAM. Maximum is set to one node for dense models and 4 nodes for MoE models.
- Parallelization Mapping Sweep: Test performance of engines with different parallelization mappings using the input ISL and OSL.
- For dense models, test different TP sizes for both prefill and decode.
- For MoE models (SGLang), evaluate both TEP and DEP as candidates for prefill and decode.
- Prefill:
- TP/TEP: Measure TTFT with batch size = 1 (assuming ISL is long enough to saturate compute) without KV reuse.
- DEP: Attention uses data parallelism. Send a single burst with total concurrency
attention_dp_size × attn_dp_num_req_ratio(defaults to 4) and compute the reported TTFT astime_to_first_token.max / attn_dp_num_req_ratiofrom the AIPerf summary of that burst.
- Decode: Measure the ITL under different numbers of in-flight requests, from 1 to the maximum the KV cache can hold. To measure ITL without being affected by piggy-backed prefill requests, the script enables KV-reuse and warms up the engine by issuing the same prompts before measuring.

- Recommendation: Select optimal parallelization mapping for prefill and decode that achieves the highest per-GPU throughput while adhering to the SLA on TTFT and ITL.
- In-Depth Profiling on the Recommended P/D Engine: Interpolate TTFT with ISL and ITL with active KV cache and decode context length for more accurate performance estimation.
- Prefill: Measures TTFT and throughput per GPU across different input lengths with batch size=1.
- Decode: Measures ITL and throughput per GPU under various KV cache loads and decode context lengths.
Profiles your model by creating real test deployments in Kubernetes and measuring their performance.
- Duration: 2-4 hours
- Accuracy: Highest (real measurements)
- GPU Requirements: Full access to test different parallelization mappings
- Backends: vLLM, SGLang, TensorRT-LLM
AIPerf-based profiling is the default behavior. Use searchStrategy: thorough for comprehensive real-engine profiling:
spec:
searchStrategy: thorough # Deep exploration with real engine profilingUses performance simulation to rapidly estimate optimal configurations without running real deployments.
- Duration: 20-30 seconds
- Accuracy: Estimated (may have errors for unusual configurations)
- GPU Requirements: None
- Backends: TensorRT-LLM only (vLLM/SGLang coming soon)
AI Configurator is used by default with searchStrategy: rapid:
spec:
searchStrategy: rapid # Fast profiling with AI Configurator simulation (default)Note
aicBackendVersion specifies the TensorRT-LLM version that AI Configurator simulates. See the AI Configurator supported features for available versions.
Currently supports:
- Backends: TensorRT-LLM (versions 0.20.0, 1.0.0rc3, 1.0.0rc6)
- Systems: H100 SXM, H200 SXM, B200 SXM, GB200 SXM, A100 SXM
- Models: Wide range including GPT, Llama, Mixtral, DeepSeek, Qwen, and more
See AI Configurator documentation for the full list.
The operator automatically discovers GPU resources from cluster nodes, providing hardware info (GPU model, VRAM, GPUs per node) and automatic profiling search space calculation.
Requirements:
- Cluster-scoped operators: Have node read permissions by default
- Namespace-scoped operators: GPU discovery is enabled by default when installing via Helm — the chart provisions the required ClusterRole/ClusterRoleBinding automatically
For namespace-scoped operators, GPU discovery is controlled by a Helm value:
# GPU discovery enabled (default) — Helm provisions read-only node access automatically
helm install dynamo-platform ... --set dynamo-operator.gpuDiscovery.enabled=true
# GPU discovery disabled — you must provide hardware config manually in each DGDR
helm install dynamo-platform ... --set dynamo-operator.gpuDiscovery.enabled=falseIf GPU discovery is disabled, provide hardware config manually in the DGDR:
spec:
hardware:
numGpusPerNode: 8
gpuSku: "H100-SXM5-80GB"
vramMb: 81920If GPU discovery is disabled and no manual hardware config is provided, the DGDR will be rejected at admission time.
All profiler configuration is provided through the v1beta1 DGDR spec fields:
apiVersion: nvidia.com/v1beta1
kind: DynamoGraphDeploymentRequest
metadata:
name: my-deployment
spec:
model: "Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B"
backend: vllm
image: "nvcr.io/nvidia/ai-dynamo/vllm-runtime:0.9.0"
searchStrategy: rapid # or thorough
autoApply: true
workload: { ... }
sla: { ... }
hardware: { ... }
features: { ... }
overrides: { ... }workload:
isl: 3000 # Average input sequence length (tokens)
osl: 150 # Average output sequence length (tokens)
sla:
ttft: 200.0 # Target Time To First Token (milliseconds)
itl: 20.0 # Target Inter-Token Latency (milliseconds)- ISL/OSL: Based on your expected traffic patterns
- TTFT: First token latency target (lower = more GPUs needed, affects prefill engine)
- ITL: Token generation latency target (lower = more GPUs needed, affects decode engine)
- Trade-offs: Tighter SLAs require more GPU resources
hardware:
gpuSku: h200_sxm # GPU SKU identifier (auto-detected)
vramMb: 81920 # VRAM per GPU in MiB
totalGpus: 16 # Total GPUs available in the cluster
numGpusPerNode: 8 # GPUs per node (for multi-node MoE)- numGpusPerNode: Determine the upper bound of GPUs per node for dense models and configure Grove for multi-node MoE engines
- gpuSku: GPU SKU identifier, auto-detected by the controller
Tip
If you don't specify hardware constraints, the controller auto-detects based on your model size and available cluster resources.
Controls the profiling search depth:
spec:
searchStrategy: rapid # "rapid" (default) for fast sweep; "thorough" for deeper exploration- rapid: Performs a fast sweep over parallelization mappings (default)
- thorough: Explores more configurations for potentially better results
Pass arguments to the SLA planner via the features section:
features:
planner:
planner_min_endpoint: 2 # Minimum endpoints to maintain
planner_adjustment_interval: 60 # Adjustment interval (seconds)
planner_load_predictor: linear # Load prediction methodNote
Planner arguments use planner_ prefix. See SLA Planner documentation for full list.
For large models, use a pre-populated PVC containing model weights instead of downloading from HuggingFace:
modelCache:
pvcName: "model-cache"
pvcModelPath: "hub/models--deepseek-ai--DeepSeek-R1"
pvcMountPath: "/opt/model-cache"Requirements:
- The PVC must exist in the same namespace as the DGDR
- The model weights must be accessible at
{mountPath}/{pvcPath}
The controller automatically handles model and backend configuration from high-level fields:
# You specify:
spec:
model: "Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B"
backend: vllm
# Controller auto-injects into the profiling jobYou should not manually set model or backend in profiling config overrides.
Provide a base DGD config via the overrides section:
overrides:
dgd:
apiVersion: nvidia.com/v1alpha1
kind: DynamoGraphDeployment
metadata:
name: my-dgd
spec:
# ... your base DGD specThe profiler uses the DGD config as a base template, then optimizes it based on your SLA targets.
The Profiler generates interpolation data that the SLA Planner uses for autoscaling decisions.
Prefill Interpolation (selected_prefill_interpolation/raw_data.npz):
prefill_isl: 1D array of input sequence lengths testedprefill_ttft: 1D array of TTFTs (ms) at each ISLprefill_thpt_per_gpu: 1D array of throughput (tokens/s/GPU) at each ISL
Decode Interpolation (selected_decode_interpolation/raw_data.npz):
max_kv_tokens: Total KV tokens capacity in decode enginex_kv_usage: 1D array of active KV usage percentages [0, 1]y_context_length: 1D array of average context lengths testedz_itl: 1D array of ITLs (ms) at each (KV usage, context length) pointz_thpt_per_gpu: 1D array of throughput (tokens/s/GPU) at each point
When using DGDR, the Dynamo Operator:
- Creates profiling jobs automatically
- Stores profiling data in ConfigMaps (
planner-profile-data) - Generates optimized DGD configurations
- Deploys the DGD with SLA Planner integration
The generated DGD is tracked via labels:
metadata:
labels:
dgdr.nvidia.com/name: my-deployment
dgdr.nvidia.com/namespace: your-namespaceMonitor profiling jobs:
kubectl logs -f job/profile-<dgdr-name> -n $NAMESPACE
kubectl describe dgdr <name> -n $NAMESPACEDisable auto-deployment to review the generated DGD before applying:
spec:
autoApply: falseThen manually extract and apply:
# Extract generated DGD from DGDR status
kubectl get dgdr my-deployment -n $NAMESPACE -o jsonpath='{.status.profilingResults.selectedConfig}' | kubectl apply -f -
# Or save to file for review
kubectl get dgdr my-deployment -n $NAMESPACE -o jsonpath='{.status.profilingResults.selectedConfig}' > my-dgd.yamlDeploy a mocker deployment that simulates engines without GPUs:
spec:
model: <model-name>
backend: trtllm
features:
mocker:
enabled: true # Deploy mocker instead of real backend
autoApply: trueProfiling still runs against the real backend to collect performance data. The mocker uses this data to simulate realistic timing behavior. Useful for large-scale experiments, testing Planner behavior, and validating configurations.
By default, profiling data is stored in ConfigMaps. For detailed artifacts (plots, logs, raw data), attach a PVC via overrides:
overrides:
profilingJob:
template:
spec:
volumes:
- name: profiling-output
persistentVolumeClaim:
claimName: "dynamo-pvc"ConfigMaps (always created):
dgdr-output-<name>: Generated DGD configurationplanner-profile-data: Profiling data for Planner (JSON)
PVC artifacts (optional):
- Performance plots (PNGs)
- DGD configurations for each profiled deployment
- AIPerf profiling artifacts
- Raw profiling data (
.npzfiles) - Profiler logs
Access PVC results:
kubectl apply -f deploy/utils/manifests/pvc-access-pod.yaml -n $NAMESPACE
kubectl wait --for=condition=Ready pod/pvc-access-pod -n $NAMESPACE --timeout=60s
kubectl cp $NAMESPACE/pvc-access-pod:/data ./profiling-results
kubectl delete pod pvc-access-pod -n $NAMESPACEThe profiler generates plots to visualize performance data:
Parallelization Mapping Sweep Plots:
prefill_performance.png: TTFT vs Parallelization Mapping sizedecode_performance.png: ITL vs Parallelization Mapping size and in-flight requests
In-Depth Profiling Plots:
selected_prefill_interpolation/prefill_ttft_interpolation.png: TTFT vs ISLselected_prefill_interpolation/prefill_throughput_interpolation.png: Throughput vs ISLselected_decode_interpolation/decode_itl_interplation.png: ITL vs KV usage and context lengthselected_decode_interpolation/decode_throughput_interpolation.png: Throughput vs KV usage and context length
SGLang workers expose profiling endpoints for runtime performance analysis:
# Start profiling
curl -X POST http://localhost:9090/engine/start_profile \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"output_dir": "/tmp/profiler_output"}'
# Run inference requests...
# Stop profiling
curl -X POST http://localhost:9090/engine/stop_profileView traces using Chrome's chrome://tracing, Perfetto UI, or TensorBoard.
The profiler logs a warning and updates the SLA to the best achievable value. To improve results:
- Relax SLA targets (increase TTFT/ITL)
- Add more GPU resources
- Try a different backend
- Use a smaller or quantized model
- Use
searchStrategy: rapidfor ~30s profiling - Reduce interpolation granularity
- Reduce the GPU search space via hardware constraints
- Reduce
max_batch_sizein engine config - Skip larger TP configurations by constraining hardware
- Use a quantized model variant
Ensure image pull secrets are configured in your namespace for the container registry.
- Profiler README — Quick overview and feature matrix
- Profiler Examples — Complete DGDR YAML examples
- Planner Guide — PlannerConfig reference and scaling modes
- DGDR API Reference — Full DGDR specification