Skip to content

Sersic fit yields significant bias in flux #108

@hbahk

Description

@hbahk

Hello,

I'm struggling with the tractor to photometer Galsim-simulated galaxy profiles. I found that the tractor fit typically underestimates given fluxes, and the Gaussian mixture model flux for a Sersic profile is generally higher than the one generated from Galsim with the same total flux. This bias seems to depend on shear, size of the PSF, size of the source, sersic index, etc.

Below are some of results,
this is the profile of the Galsim and tractor model with Gaussian PSF of sigma = 5 pix.
drawing

If this model is optimized then it gives slightly lower flux.
drawing

If I apply some shear, then the flux of the tractor mod gets boosted and the optimized flux gives underestimated value.
drawing
drawing

This bias gets even worse for smaller PSF (I'm handling images of which PSF width < 1 pix)
drawing
drawing

This behavior is also depends on sersic index and half light radius.
drawing

Freezing all shape parameters and thawing only brightness still show this bias..
drawing

I checked the legacy survey photometry and COSMOS2020 The Farmer catalog, but in these catalog this bias seems to be somehow corrected, or not existed at the first place.
drawing
drawing

Did you recognize this flux bias? Then how did you resolve this for the legacy survey photometry?
If not, did I make a mistake?

Thank you for your amazing work on the tractor by the way.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions