nit

Author: szarnyasg

_posts/2025-05-19-the-lost-decade-of-small-data.md

@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ But what do those cold numbers actually mean? The hidden sensation is that we ac
 
 But how do those results stack up against a modern MacBook? As a comparison point, we used a modern ARM-based [M3 Max MacBook Pro](https://everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook_pro/specs/macbook-pro-m3-max-16-core-cpu-40-core-gpu-14-late-2023-specs.html), which happened to be sitting on the same desk. But between them, the two MacBooks represent more than a decade of hardware development.
 
-Looking at [GeekBench 5 benchmark scores](https://everymac.com/ultimate-mac-comparison-chart/?compare=all-macs&highlight=0&prod1=MacBookPro159&prod2=MacBookPro063&prod3=) alone, we see a ca. 7x difference in raw CPU speed when using all cores, and ca. factor 3 difference in single-core speed. Of course there are also big differences in RAM and SSD speeds. Funnily, the display size and resolution are almost unchanged.
+Looking at [GeekBench 5 benchmark scores](https://everymac.com/ultimate-mac-comparison-chart/?compare=all-macs&highlight=0&prod1=MacBookPro159&prod2=MacBookPro063&prod3=) alone, we see a ca. 7× difference in raw CPU speed when using all cores, and ca. factor 3 difference in single-core speed. Of course there are also big differences in RAM and SSD speeds. Funnily, the display size and resolution are almost unchanged.
 
 Here are the results side-by-side:
 
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ Here are the results side-by-side:
 |    21 |      1011.9 |        47.8 |   21.17 |
 |    22 |        57.7 |         4.3 |   13.42 |
 
-We do see significant speedups, between 7 up to as much as 53. The [geometric mean](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_mean) of the timings improved from 218 to 12, a ca. 20x improvement.
+We do see significant speedups, between 7 up to as much as 53. The [geometric mean](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_mean) of the timings improved from 218 to 12, a ca. 20× improvement.
 
 ## Reproducibility