Replies: 1 comment
-
There have been previous discussions about including cached_httpfs as a feature in the main httpfs extension: #88 (comment) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
It's known httpfs has certain limitations, for example
You choose to copy the file into the main repo, instead of using it as a standalone dependency; my groundlessly guess you plan to make changes to the httpfs source code itself, instead of having a cache wrapper around, which makes sense to me.
So I'm wondering would you consider making it it a separate extension, so it benefits the whole community rather than just pg_duckdb.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions