Restructure Package Naming #1924
juliapampus
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Thanks for putting this together. Here are some things we need to consider:
Maybe we can start to distill the rules for package naming which will allow us to derive the individual module names? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Package Renaming
If you take a look at the current packaging structure, the naming is not consistent. Sometimes it is *.core and core.*, same goes for spi. The module refactoring did not make it better. As people are using the EDC artifacts as dependecy, we need to discuss about a cleaner package naming.
Initial proposal for the "new" column tbw.
:core
:data-protocols
:extensions
:samples
:spi
:system-tests
:tooling
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions