Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi @JoanGi, thank you for your question and the compliments :)

One major difference to our scoping implementation compared to Xtext is that we left the default implementation mostly empty. Like you noticed it works in a local scope, but there's no fully qualified name referencing mechanism. We opted for this mostly for two reasons, 1. its easier ;) 2. with Xtext the most popular use case was building programming languages, which use fully qualified names only in selected scenarios, usually relying on the local and global scope otherwise.

Anyway, you can take a look at the domainmodel example scoping, if you want to achieve fully qualified name scoping behavior.

Replies: 2 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by JoanGi
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants