diff --git a/process/_assets/score_process_area_overview.drawio.svg b/process/_assets/score_process_area_overview.drawio.svg index be313e7b26..0af3aedf88 100644 --- a/process/_assets/score_process_area_overview.drawio.svg +++ b/process/_assets/score_process_area_overview.drawio.svg @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ - + @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ - + @@ -870,4 +870,4 @@ - \ No newline at end of file + diff --git a/process/process_areas/index.rst b/process/process_areas/index.rst index ed4b8f8066..35d058d8bc 100644 --- a/process/process_areas/index.rst +++ b/process/process_areas/index.rst @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ Process Areas implementation/index.rst platform_management/index.rst problem_resolution/index.rst + quality_management/index.rst release_management/index.rst requirements_engineering/index.rst safety_analysis/index.rst diff --git a/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/index.rst b/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..88a6dbc0c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +.. + # ******************************************************************************* + # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation + # + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional + # information regarding copyright ownership. + # + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + # + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + # ******************************************************************************* + +Guidance +######## + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 1 + + quality_report_template + quality_review_checklist + quality_plan_guideline + quality_process_reqs + quality_work_product_review_guideline + quality_plan_template diff --git a/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_plan_guideline.rst b/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_plan_guideline.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..9b24c9db6c --- /dev/null +++ b/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_plan_guideline.rst @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +.. + # ******************************************************************************* + # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation + # + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional + # information regarding copyright ownership. + # + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + # + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + # ******************************************************************************* + +.. _guideline_quality_plan: + +Guideline Quality Management Plan +################################# + +.. gd_guidl:: Quality Management Plan Definitions Guideline + :id: gd_guidl__qlm_plan_definitions + :status: valid + :complies: std_wp__iso26262__management_553, std_req__iso26262__management_5423, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP1, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP2, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP3, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP4, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP7, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP1, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP2, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP3, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP4, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP5, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP6, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP7, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP5, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP6, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP8 + + | **Overall quality management:** + | Quality culture: + | Quality as well as Safety and Security Culture is planned to grow in the SW platform. This shall be fostered by doing process conformance checks and work product reviews, as well as lessons learned + | after each feature development completion and a process audit after each platform/project release. Delta audits allowed based on variation statement. + | The main outcome is the :need:`wp__process_impr_report`, which is used to improve the processes for the platform/project. + + | + | Quality Management: + | ASPICE 4.0 standard is selected for quality management. Processes will always link to the :ref:`standard_iso26262` standard, :ref:`standard_isopas8926` standard, :ref:`standard_isosae21434` and to the `ASPICE 4.0 `_ standard. + | + | Communication: + | Cross functional teams are interdisciplinary, so the regular (sprint) planning and review meetings enable communication. The organization of the project is described in the Project Management Plan. Another main communication means are the Pull Request (PR) reviews. + | Also the standard Eclipse Foundation communication strategies are used (e.g. mailing lists, messenger). + | + | Quality issues, non-conformances and improvements: + | Feedback from the field, but also during development of change requests to existing features, bug reporting by the Open Source community or integration of existing SW components into new features may lead to the discovery of issues, non-conformances or improvements. + | Non-conformance can also be deviations from the development process with impact on safety or security. + | If these are known at the time of creation of a release they will be part of the :need:`wp__platform_sw_release_note` for the feature. + | Other issues and non-conformances relevant for already delivered releases will be identified as such and communicated (as defined in Problem Resolution part of the Project Management Plan) via the :need:`wp__issue_track_system`. + | + | **Tailoring quality activities:** + | Main tailoring driver is that the SW platform is pure SW development and is provided as "SW element" - this explains mainly the generic, platform wide tailoring. + | Tailoring is done for the whole SW platform by defining only the relevant processes and their resulting outcomes and an argumentation why the others are not needed in `ASPICE 4.0 `_. + | + | **Planning quality activities:** + | In the Quality Management Plan the nomination of the quality manager :need:`rl__quality_manager` and the project lead :need:`rl__project_lead` is documented. + | The planning of quality activities is done using issues in the :need:`wp__issue_track_system` as specified in the Project Management part of the Project Management Plan. + | It contains for each issue + | * objective - as part of the issue description + | * dependencies on other activities or information - by links to the respective issues + | * responsible person for the activity - as issue assignee + | * required resources for the activity - by selecting a team label (or "project") pointing to a team of committers dedicated to the issue resolution + | * duration in time, including start and end point - by selecting a milestone + | * UID of the resulting work products - stated in the issue title + | + | The planning of quality activities is part of + | * generic planning, dealing with all work products needed only once for the platform. This is included in the Quality Management Platform Plan. + | + | **Planning supporting processes:** + | Supporting processes (Requirements Management, Configuration Management, Change Management, Documentation Management, Tool Management) are planned within the Project Management Plan. + | + | **Planning integration and verification:** + | Integration on the target hardware is not done in the scope of the SW platform project, but SW/SW integration up to the feature level is performed and its test results are part of the :need:`wp__verification__platform_ver_report`. + | The integration on the target hardware, done by the distributor or OEM, is supported by delivering a set of HW/SW feature integration and platform tests which were already run successfully on a reference HW platform. + | This is planned by the respective workproducts: + | * :need:`wp__verification__feat_int_test` + | * :need:`wp__verification__platform_test` + | Verification planning is documented in :need:`wp__verification__plan` + | + | **Scheduling of audits, conformance checks, work product reviews, release verification and approval:** + | Scheduling is done in the same way as for all work products definition by issues. The respective work products are listed in :need:`doc_concept__wp_inspections`. diff --git a/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_plan_template.rst b/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_plan_template.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..663c9fb587 --- /dev/null +++ b/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_plan_template.rst @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ +.. + # ******************************************************************************* + # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation + # + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional + # information regarding copyright ownership. + # + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + # + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + # ******************************************************************************* + +.. _quality templates: + +Template Quality Plan +===================== + +.. gd_temp:: Quality Management Plan Template + :id: gd_temp__qlm_plan + :status: valid + :complies: std_wp__iso26262__management_553, std_req__iso26262__management_5423, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP1, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP2, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP3, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP4, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP7, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP1, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP2, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP3, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP4, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP5, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP6, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP7 + +:note: The quality management plan shall be continuously maintained during the project. + Deviations to the platform plan should be documented here. + +Purpose +------- +Description of the purpose of the Quality Management Plan. + +Statement of Independence +------------------------- +Description of the used approach for independence. + +Objectives and scope +-------------------- + +3.1 Quality Objectives +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +.. list-table:: Standards to comply with + :header-rows: 1 + :widths: 15,85,15 + + * - # + - **Standard Name** + - **Version** + * - 1 + - Automotive SPICE PAM + - 4.0 + * - 2 + - ISO 262626:2018 + - 2018 + * - 3 + - ISO/SAE 21434:2021 + - 2021 + * - 4 + - ISO PAS 8926:2024 (will be integrated into ISO 26262 3rd edition as updated part 8 clause 12) + - 2024 + +3.2 Quality Performance Objectives +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +Description of the Quality Performance Objectives. + +3.3 Quantitative Quality Goals +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +Description of the Quantitative Quality Goals. + +3.4 Work Product Quality Goals +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +Description of the Work Product Quality Goals. + +3.5 Quality Management Scope +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +Description of the Quality Management Scope. + +**Tailoring of quality assurance activities** +Describe the used tailoring of quality assurance activities. + +3.6 Quality Management Organization +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +Describe the project strategy to qualify the platform or components of the platform to the appropriate international standards and directives. + +**Eclipse Roles** +Description of Eclipse roles. + +**Project Roles** +Description of project roles. + +**Critical dependencies** +Description of critical dependencies. + +**Risks** +Description of used risk management. + +**Skills** +Description of the used skill approvals. + +1. Quality Management Planning +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +4.1 Quality Resources +"""""""""""""""""""""" +Description of the used resources and milestones. +Description of the planning of resources and milestones. + +4.2 Quality Management Communication +"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" +Description of used Communication possibilities. + +**Reporting** +Description of used reporting. + +**Escalation** +Description of used Escalation path. + +4.3 Quality Management Specifics +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +Description of Quality Management Specifics. + +4.4 Quality Management Generic workproducts +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +Description of used Generic Workproducts for Quality Management. diff --git a/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_process_reqs.rst b/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_process_reqs.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..941c94b9e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_process_reqs.rst @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +.. + # ******************************************************************************* + # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation + # + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional + # information regarding copyright ownership. + # + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + # + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + # ******************************************************************************* + +Process Requirements +==================== + +.. gd_req:: Quality report automated generation + :id: gd_req__qlm_report + :status: valid + :tags: quality_management + :satisfies: wf__mr_imp_qlm_plan_processes + :complies: std_req__iso26262__management_5423, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP5, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP6 + + | The quality report shall be generated progressively and automatically compiling the work products. + | A template exists to guide the reporting and the right collection of the required work products. diff --git a/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_report_template.rst b/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_report_template.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..02c653cd9b --- /dev/null +++ b/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_report_template.rst @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +.. + # ******************************************************************************* + # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation + # + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional + # information regarding copyright ownership. + # + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + # + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + # ******************************************************************************* + +.. _quality_report_template: + +Template Quality Report +======================= + +.. gd_temp:: Quality Report Template + :id: gd_temp__qlm_report + :status: valid + :complies: std_wp__iso26262__management_553, std_req__iso26262__management_5423, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP1, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP2, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP3, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP4, std_req__aspice_40__SUP-1-BP7, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP1, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP2, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP3, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP4, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP5, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP6, std_req__aspice_40__PIM-3-BP7 + + This document implements :need:`wp__qms_report`. + + | Place the document header here following the `REPLACE_doc__documentation_mgt_plan`. + | + | This Quality Report is based on the :need:`wp__qms_plan`. + | + | Quality Report contains: + | + | **1. Quality Overview** + | + | **1.1. Lists of all work products** + | - List of all work products, compared to the :need:`wp__qms_plan` + | - Status (valid / invalid) + | + | **1.2. Lists of all reports** + | - List of all reports, compared to the :need:`wp__qms_plan` + | - Results of the reports + | + | **1.3. Test coverage** + | - Overview of test coverage (overall, requirements, architecture) + | - Ratio of test coverage to the :need:`wp__verification__plan` + | + | **1.4. Issues** + | - List of all issues, compared to the :need:`wp__qms_plan` + | - Status of the issues (open / closed) + | + | **1.5. Quality Trainings** + | - List of all quality trainings, compared to the :need:`wp__qms_plan` + | - Status of the quality trainings (planned / completed) + | + | **1.5. Process Improvement** + | - List of all process improvements, compared to the :need:`wp__process_impr_report` + | - Status of the process improvements (open / closed) + | + | **1.6. External reports** + | - List of all external reports, compared to the :need:`wp__qms_plan` + | - Status of the external reports (valid / invalid) + | + + **Note1:** All the above lists are generated automatically diff --git a/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_review_checklist.rst b/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_review_checklist.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..18f960dc9e --- /dev/null +++ b/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_review_checklist.rst @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ +.. + # ******************************************************************************* + # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation + # + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional + # information regarding copyright ownership. + # + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + # + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + # ******************************************************************************* + +.. _quality workproduct review checklist: + +Checklist Quality Work Product Review +===================================== + +.. gd_chklst:: Quality Work Product Review Checklist + :id: gd_chklst__review_checklist + :status: valid + :tags: quality_management + + +.. note:: Formal checks has to be done. It's planed to automate them but actually under consideration. + +.. list-table:: Project Management plan review checklist template + :header-rows: 1 + :widths: 10,30,10,30,20 + + * - Review Id + - Acceptance criteria + - passed [yes | no] + - Remarks + - Issue link + * - PJP_00_01 + - Are the purpose and goals of the project defined (including references to related projects, if existing)? + - + - + - + * - PJP_00_02 + - Is the scope of the project defined? + - + - + - + * - PJP_00_04 + - Is the project life-cycle defined? + - + - + - + * - PJP_00_05 + - Are major project metrics to track the progress described? + - + - + - + * - PJP_01_01 + - Are all for the project necessary roles assigned to team members? + - + - + - + * - PJP_01_02 + - Are skill needs and planned trainings documented/referenced? + - + - + - + * - PJP_02_01 + - Are the project milestones described/referenced? (And are they feasible?) + - + - + - + * - PJP_02_02 + - Are project activities defined, assigned and scheduled according to the defined project life cycle and estimations in a work breakdown structure? + - + - + - + * - PJP_02_03 + - Are project activities monitored and adjusted? + - + - + - + * - PJP_02_04 + - Are the activities structured and of a manageable size? + - + - + - + * - PJP_02_05 + - Is the technical infrastructure and resources needed described? + - + - + - + * - PJP_03_01 + - Are communication interfaces between all involved parties defined (who communicates, what, in which intervals, over which channels, internal vs. Customer communication)? + - + - + - + * - PJP_04_01 + - Have the reports for the project being defined? (Including required content, maintenance schedule etc.) + - + - + - + + +.. list-table:: Quality Management plan review checklist template + :header-rows: 1 + :widths: 10,30,10,30,20 + + * - Review Id + - Acceptance criteria + - passed [yes | no] + - Remarks + - Issue link + * - QMP_00_01 + - Are the scope and goals defined (including references to related quality standards, internal regulations etc. if existing)? + - + - + - + * - QMP_00_02 + - Are all work products in the process area of quality management defined? + - + - + - + * - QMP_00_03 + - Are roles and responsibilities in the process area of quality management defined? + - + - + - + * - QMP_01_01 + - Are metrics for quality management in the project specified, tracked and are they suitable for process improvement? + - + - + - + * - QMP_01_02 + - Do all quality metrics have an acceptance criteria specified? + - + - + - + * - QMP_01_03 + - Is quality reporting described including cadence, relevant parties and documentation? + - + - + - + * - QMP_02_01 + - Are the quality milestones described or referenced in a quality Schedule, and are they feasible? + - + - + - + * - QMP_03_01 + - Is the approach of conducting work product reviews defined and appropriate? + - + - + - + * - QMP_03_02 + - Is the approach of conducting process audits defined and appropriate? + - + - + - + * - QMP_04_01 + - Is the process of handling problems and/or non-conformances defined? + - + - + - + * - QMP_04_02 + - Is there a specification on how to ensure the resolution of process non-conformances? + - + - + - + * - QMP_04_03 + - Is there a specification on how to escalate process non-conformances in situations where goals of quality management conflict with those of other process areas? + - + - + - + * - QMP_04_04 + - Do the described mechanisms show that quality assurance has the independence and authority to escalate problems to appropriate levels of management? + - + - + - + +:note: Additional review checklists will be added in the future. Use the above templates as a starting point for your own checklists. diff --git a/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_work_product_review_guideline.rst b/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_work_product_review_guideline.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..6e80a6d236 --- /dev/null +++ b/process/process_areas/quality_management/guidance/quality_work_product_review_guideline.rst @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +.. + # ******************************************************************************* + # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation + # + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional + # information regarding copyright ownership. + # + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + # + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + # ******************************************************************************* + + +Quality Work Product Review Guideline +===================================== + +.. gd_guidl:: Quality work product review + :id: gd_guidl__wp_review + :status: valid + +Purpose +------- +| Definition of a generic workflow to ensure the quality of work products. + +Objectives +---------- +| Check and assure the quality of the project/platform work products. + +Process +------- + +| Step 1: Create issue with label ``q_wp_review`` in status OPEN +| Step 2: Identify which work products will be checked during the review and document it in the created issue +| Step 3: Adjust :need:`gd_chklst__review_checklist` based on specified work products to review, which contains acceptance criteria for all work products +| Step 4: Create PR, Link the stored checklist in the PR to the issue +| Step 5: Perform review according to checklist +| Step 6: Report deviations from the acceptance criteria in the issue tracking system with label ``bug`` and link it to the review issue and the checklist +| Step 7: Review result: +| negative, in case of any deviation, continue with STEP 8 +| positive, in case of no deviations, continue with STEP 10 +| Step 8: Trigger authors of WPs with deviations to resolve them in the same PR and close the corresponding bug issue +| Step 9: If all bug issues are resolved, continue with 5, otherwise continue with 8 +| Step 10: Merge the PR and communicate the result, initial issue is now in status CLOSED diff --git a/process/process_areas/quality_management/index.rst b/process/process_areas/quality_management/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..297bd24ba5 --- /dev/null +++ b/process/process_areas/quality_management/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +.. + # ******************************************************************************* + # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation + # + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional + # information regarding copyright ownership. + # + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + # + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + # ******************************************************************************* + +.. _quality_management: + +Quality Management +################## + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 1 + + quality_getstrt + quality_concept + guidance/index + quality_roles + quality_workflow + quality_workproducts diff --git a/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_concept.rst b/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_concept.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..c6caf0ee01 --- /dev/null +++ b/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_concept.rst @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +.. + # ******************************************************************************* + # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation + # + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional + # information regarding copyright ownership. + # + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + # + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + # ******************************************************************************* + +Concept +####### + +.. doc_concept:: Quality Management Concept + :id: doc_concept__quality__process + :status: valid + :tags: quality_management + +In this section a concept for the Quality Management will be discussed. Inputs for this concepts is ASPICE SUP.1 +as quality standard. And also in aspect to the development the addressed requirements from ISO 26262, ISO/SAE 21434 +and ISO PAS 8926. + +Inputs +****** + +#. Stakeholders for the Quality Management +#. Who needs which information? +#. How is Quality ensured? + +Stakeholders for the Quality Management +======================================= + +#. :need:`Quality Manager ` + * Creating/maintain Quality Management Plan + * Verify/approve Platform release + * Execute Platform Process Audit + * Execute Feature Contribution Conformance Checks + * Execute Work Product Reviews + * Consult and execute Quality Trainings + * Monitoring/improving of Quality activities + +#. :need:`Technical Lead ` + * Support the work products + * Approval of Quality Management Plan, Platform Process Audit, Feature Process Conformance Checks, Work Product Reviews, Consult and Execute Quality Trainings, Monitor/Improve Quality Activities + +#. :need:`Project Lead ` + * Approval of Platform Release + +#. :need:`Committer ` + * Support the Work Product Reviews + +#. :need:`Safety Manager ` + * Supports the quality activities + +#. :need:`Security Manager ` + * Supports the quality activities + +Standard Requirements +===================== + +Quality requirements of the following standards need to be taken into consideration: + +* ASPICE PAM 4.0 +* ISO 26262:2018 +* ISO 21434:2021 +* ISO PAS 8926:2024 + +General Quality Concept +======================= + +The Quality Concept is based on the requirements of the standards and were derived into the Quality Performance +Objectives that are listed in the Quality Management Plan. The Quality shall be continuous +checked and improved during the development. All tasks are planned within the Quality Management Plan. These +includes tasks like platform process audit or feature contribution conformance checks which have to be planed to milestones +or in a continuous manner. Only 100% compliant work products / releases will be formally delivered to the community. + +Every person who contributes shall be trained according to Quality aspects. The committers will help to ensure the Quality +by following the workflows which are defined in the different process areas. The Quality Manager is responsible for the +Quality related workflows. The Quality Manager shall be independent from the development organisation with a escalation +to the Project Lead Circle and the Technical Lead Circle. diff --git a/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_getstrt.rst b/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_getstrt.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..babd0e6c47 --- /dev/null +++ b/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_getstrt.rst @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +.. + # ******************************************************************************* + # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation + # + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional + # information regarding copyright ownership. + # + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + # + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + # ******************************************************************************* + +Getting started +############### + +.. doc_getstrt:: Getting Started on Quality Management + :id: doc_getstrt__quality__process + :status: valid + :tags: quality_management + +This document describes the steps which need to be done to ensure Quality according to ASPICE 4.0 as used +standard in the project. + +Therefore guidelines :need:`gd_guidl__qlm_plan_definitions`, :need:`gd_guidl__wp_review` and a :need:`doc_concept__quality__process` are available. + +General Workflow +**************** + +One goal of the Quality Management Process is to ensure that the project is following the defined processes and +that the quality of the deliverables is according to the requirements. The Quality Management process follows an +continuous approach. + +The workflows are defined in the :ref:`quality_workflows` section. The following workflows shall be executed continuously: + +* Consult and Execute Quality Trainings +* Monitor/Improve Quality Activities + +For every release, the following workflows are executed: + +* Create/Maintain Quality Management Plan +* Verify/Approve Platform Release +* Execute Platform Process Audit +* Execute Execute Feature Contribution Conformance Checks +* Execute Work Product Reviews + +For open issues the issue tracking system is used to track the issues and to ensure that they are resolved in time. +The issue tracking system is defined in the :need:`wp__issue_track_system`. diff --git a/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_roles.rst b/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_roles.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d2c3c63d23 --- /dev/null +++ b/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_roles.rst @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +.. + # ******************************************************************************* + # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation + # + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional + # information regarding copyright ownership. + # + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + # + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + # ******************************************************************************* + +Roles +##### + +.. role:: Quality Manager + :id: rl__quality_manager + :status: valid + + The quality managers shall be responsible for the planning and coordination of the quality activities, i.e. the quality management. They shall lead and monitor the quality relevant activities of the project. + + + Required skills + + * Master’s degree in electrical engineering/computer science/mathematics, or similar degree, or comparable work experience + * Solid understanding of software quality management + * Knowledge in project management + * Deep understanding of quality criteria and the correlating methods and procedures to achieve and verify them + * Technical know-how of embedded systems + * Preferred Training: ASPICE 4.0 (see training path, https://intacs.info/index.php/certification-center) at least Expert or Professional Assessor + + Knowledge of standards + + * Deep knowledge of ASPICE PAM 4.0 + * Basic knowledge of ISO 26262 + * Basic knowledge of ISOSAE 21434 + + Experience + + * 2 years of experience in software quality management + * Experience in managing projects + + Responsibility + + * Creating/maintain Quality Management Plan + * Verify/approve Platform release + * Execute Platform Process Audit + * Execute Feature Contribution Conformance Checks + * Execute Work Product Reviews + * Consult and execute Quality Trainings + * Monitoring/improving of Quality activities + + Authority + + * Escalation of planning topics to the project lead :need:`rl__project_lead` + * Definition of quality assurance measures + * Refusing the approval of work products as defined in the workflows diff --git a/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_workflow.rst b/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_workflow.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..069d429149 --- /dev/null +++ b/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_workflow.rst @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ +.. + # ******************************************************************************* + # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation + # + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional + # information regarding copyright ownership. + # + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + # + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + # ******************************************************************************* + +.. _quality_workflows: + +Workflows +--------- + +.. workflow:: Create/Maintain Quality Management Plan + :id: wf__cr_mt_qlm_plan + :status: valid + :responsible: rl__quality_manager + :approved_by: rl__technical_lead + :supported_by: + :input: wp__policies, wp__issue_track_system, wp__platform_mgmt + :output: wp__qms_plan + :contains: gd_guidl__qlm_plan_definitions, gd_temp__qlm_plan + :has: doc_concept__quality__process, doc_getstrt__quality__process + + | The Quality Management Plan is created and maintained by the :need:`rl__quality_manager`. + +.. workflow:: Verify/Approve Platform Release + :id: wf__vy_ap_pltrelease + :status: valid + :responsible: rl__quality_manager + :approved_by: rl__project_lead + :supported_by: rl__technical_lead + :input: wp__qms_plan + :output: wp__platform_sw_release_note + :contains: gd_guidl__qlm_plan_definitions, gd_chklst__review_checklist + :has: doc_concept__quality__process, doc_getstrt__quality__process + + | The project/platform release is verified and approved. + +.. workflow:: Execute Platform Process Audit + :id: wf__exe_pltprocess_audit + :status: valid + :responsible: rl__quality_manager + :approved_by: rl__technical_lead + :supported_by: rl__safety_manager, rl__security_manager + :input: wp__qms_plan, wp__process_definition + :output: wp__process_impr_report + :contains: gd_guidl__qlm_plan_definitions, gd_chklst__review_checklist + :has: doc_concept__quality__process, doc_getstrt__quality__process + + | The project/platform processes are audited. + +.. workflow:: Execute Feature Contribution Conformance Checks + :id: wf__exe_featprocess_conformance_checks + :status: valid + :responsible: rl__quality_manager + :approved_by: rl__technical_lead + :supported_by: rl__safety_manager, rl__security_manager + :input: wp__qms_plan, wp__feat_request, wp__process_definition + :output: wp__qms_report + :contains: gd_guidl__qlm_plan_definitions, gd_chklst__review_checklist + :has: doc_concept__quality__process, doc_getstrt__quality__process + + | The conformance of the feature contribution is checked. + +.. workflow:: Execute Work Product Reviews + :id: wf__exe_wp_review + :status: valid + :responsible: rl__quality_manager + :approved_by: rl__technical_lead + :supported_by: rl__committer + :input: wp__qms_plan, wp__process_definition + :output: wp__verification__platform_ver_report + :contains: gd_guidl__qlm_plan_definitions, gd_chklst__review_checklist, gd_guidl__wp_review + :has: doc_concept__quality__process, doc_getstrt__quality__process + + | The quality of the work products is assured. + +.. workflow:: Consult and Execute Quality Trainings + :id: wf__consult_exe_qly_training + :status: valid + :responsible: rl__quality_manager + :approved_by: rl__technical_lead + :supported_by: rl__safety_manager, rl__security_manager + :input: wp__qms_plan, wp__policies, wp__process_definition + :output: wp__training_path + :contains: gd_guidl__qlm_plan_definitions + :has: doc_concept__quality__process, doc_getstrt__quality__process + + | The quality manager :need:`rl__quality_manager` consults all project/platform stakeholder as defined in :need:`doc_concept__quality__process` for quality topics and executes regularly quality trainings. + +.. workflow:: Monitor/Improve Quality Activities + :id: wf__mr_imp_qlm_plan_processes + :status: valid + :responsible: rl__quality_manager + :approved_by: rl__technical_lead + :supported_by: rl__safety_manager, rl__security_manager + :input: wp__qms_plan, wp__platform_sw_release_note, wp__module_sw_release_note, wp__process_impr_report, wp__qms_report, wp__verification__platform_ver_report, wp__verification__module_ver_report, wp__training_path + :output: wp__issue_track_system + :contains: gd_guidl__qlm_plan_definitions, gd_chklst__review_checklist, gd_req__qlm_report + :has: doc_concept__quality__process, doc_getstrt__quality__process + + | The quality manager :need:`rl__quality_manager` is responsible for the monitoring of the activities against the quality management plan. + | The quality manager :need:`rl__quality_manager` is responsible to adjust the quality management plan, if deviations are detected. + + +.. needextend:: "process_areas/quality_management" in docname + :+tags: quality_management + +RAS(IC) for Safety Analysis +*************************** + +.. needtable:: RASIC Overview for Quality Management + :tags: quality_management + :filter: "quality_management" in tags and type == "workflow" + :style: table + :sort: status + :columns: id as "Activity";responsible as "Responsible";approved_by as "Approver";supported_by as "Supporter" + :colwidths: 30,30,30,30 diff --git a/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_workproducts.rst b/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_workproducts.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..4c6663146a --- /dev/null +++ b/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_workproducts.rst @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +.. + # ******************************************************************************* + # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation + # + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional + # information regarding copyright ownership. + # + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + # + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + # ******************************************************************************* + +Workproducts +############ + +.. workproduct:: Quality Management Plan + :id: wp__qms_plan + :status: valid + :tags: quality_management + :complies: std_wp__iso26262__management_553, std_req__iso26262__management_5423 + + | Quality Management Plan to define the quality aspects like: + | * Quality strategy + | * Description of independencies and objective assurance + | * Quality assurance activities + | * Role definitions + | * Quality Goals + | * Schedules + +.. workproduct:: Quality report + :id: wp__qms_report + :status: valid + :tags: quality_management + :complies: std_req__aspice_40__iic-13-19 + + | The quality report summarizes the results of the quality related activities + +.. workproduct:: Process Improvement Report + :id: wp__process_impr_report + :status: valid + :tags: quality_management + :complies: std_req__aspice_40__iic-07-04, std_req__aspice_40__iic-15-13 + + | Process Improvement Report that describes the improvement with description of: + | * Description of used methods, assumptions, involved persons, etc. + | * Scope of improvement + | * Estimations regarding impact and time + | * Commitment on the improvement + | * Description of the improvement incl. goals and prioritisation + | * Measures to validate the effectiveness of the improvement diff --git a/process/process_areas/requirements_engineering/requirements_workflow.rst b/process/process_areas/requirements_engineering/requirements_workflow.rst index 3a33a23668..e963d43b19 100644 --- a/process/process_areas/requirements_engineering/requirements_workflow.rst +++ b/process/process_areas/requirements_engineering/requirements_workflow.rst @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Workflow Requirements Engineering :responsible: rl__contributor :approved_by: rl__technical_lead :supported_by: rl__safety_manager, rl__security_manager - :input: wp__requirements__stkh, wp__issue_track_system, wp__feature_safety_analysis, wp__feature_dfa + :input: wp__requirements__stkh, wp__issue_track_system :output: wp__requirements__feat, wp__requirements__feat_aou, wp__platform_safety_manual :contains: gd_temp__req__feat_req, gd_temp__req__formulation :has: doc_concept__req__process, doc_getstrt__req__process @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Workflow Requirements Engineering :responsible: rl__contributor :approved_by: rl__committer :supported_by: rl__safety_manager, rl__security_manager - :input: wp__requirements__feat, wp__issue_track_system, wp__sw_component_safety_analysis, wp__sw_component_dfa + :input: wp__requirements__feat, wp__issue_track_system :output: wp__requirements__comp, wp__requirements__comp_aou, wp__platform_safety_manual :contains: gd_temp__req__comp_req, gd_temp__req__formulation :has: doc_concept__req__process, doc_getstrt__req__process diff --git a/process/roles/index.rst b/process/roles/index.rst index 52ab40d455..df309c5296 100644 --- a/process/roles/index.rst +++ b/process/roles/index.rst @@ -48,14 +48,6 @@ S-CORE Management Roles * Election and replacement of all role's personnel * Decide on addition/removal of modules repositories or split-off of projects -.. role:: Quality Manager - :id: rl__quality_manager - :status: valid - :tags: quality_management - :contains: rl__committer - - The quality managers shall be responsible for the planning and coordination of the quality activities, i.e. the quality management. - .. role:: Security Manager :id: rl__security_manager :status: draft diff --git a/process/workflows/index.rst b/process/workflows/index.rst index 399caab3be..b9936b0871 100644 --- a/process/workflows/index.rst +++ b/process/workflows/index.rst @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ Workflows :caption: Contents: process_management - quality_management S-CORE Workflow list diff --git a/process/workflows/quality_management.rst b/process/workflows/quality_management.rst deleted file mode 100644 index 4c2675f9e2..0000000000 --- a/process/workflows/quality_management.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,107 +0,0 @@ -.. - # ******************************************************************************* - # Copyright (c) 2024 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation - # - # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional - # information regarding copyright ownership. - # - # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the - # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at - # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 - # - # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 - # ******************************************************************************* - -Quality Management -================== - - -Workflows ---------- - -todo: need to add guidance and standard links - -.. workflow:: Create/Maintain Quality Plan - :id: wf__cr_mt_qlm_plan - :status: draft - :tags: quality_management - :responsible: rl__committer - :approved_by: rl__quality_manager - :supported_by: rl__technical_lead - :input: wp__policies, wp__issue_track_system - :output: wp__qms - - | The quality plan is created and maintained by a :need:`rl__committer`. - -.. workflow:: Verify/Approve Platform Release - :id: wf__vy_ap_pltrelease - :status: draft - :tags: quality_management - :responsible: rl__committer - :approved_by: rl__quality_manager - :supported_by: rl__technical_lead - :input: wp__qms - :output: wp__platform_sw_release_note - - | The project/platform release is verified and approved. - -.. workflow:: Execute Platform Process Audit - :id: wf__exe_pltprocess_audit - :status: draft - :tags: quality_management - :responsible: rl__quality_manager - :approved_by: rl__technical_lead - :supported_by: rl__safety_manager, rl__security_manager - :input: wp__qms, wp__process_definition - :output: wp__process_impr_report - - | The project/platform processes are audited. - -.. workflow:: Execute Feature Process Compliance Checks - :id: wf__exe_featprocess_compliance_checks - :status: draft - :tags: quality_management - :responsible: rl__committer - :approved_by: rl__quality_manager - :supported_by: rl__technical_lead - :input: wp__qms, wp__feat_request, wp__process_definition - :output: wp__qms_report - - | The compliance of the feature contribution is checked. - -.. workflow:: Execute Feature Work Product Reviews - :id: wf__exe_featwp_review - :status: draft - :tags: quality_management - :responsible: rl__committer - :approved_by: rl__quality_manager - :supported_by: rl__technical_lead - :input: wp__qms, wp__process_definition - :output: wp__verification__platform_ver_report - - | The quality of the work products is assured. - -.. workflow:: Consult and Execute Quality Trainings - :id: wf__consult_exe_qly_training - :status: draft - :tags: quality_management - :responsible: rl__committer - :approved_by: rl__quality_manager - :supported_by: rl__technical_lead - :input: wp__qms, wp__policies, wp__process_definition - :output: wp__training_path - - | The quality manager consults all project/platform stakeholder for quality topics and executes regulary quality trainings. - -.. workflow:: Monitor/Improve Quality Activities - :id: wf__mr_imp_qlm_plan_processes - :status: draft - :tags: quality_management - :responsible: rl__committer - :approved_by: rl__quality_manager - :supported_by: rl__technical_lead - :input: wp__qms, wp__platform_sw_release_note, wp__module_sw_release_note, wp__process_impr_report, wp__qms_report, wp__verification__platform_ver_report, wp__verification__module_ver_report, wp__training_path - :output: wp__issue_track_system - - | The Quality Manager is responsible for the monitoring of the activities against the quality management plan. - | The Quality Manager is responsible to adjust the plan, if deviations are detected. diff --git a/process/workproducts/index.rst b/process/workproducts/index.rst index e9af4c63c9..24ee39ed80 100644 --- a/process/workproducts/index.rst +++ b/process/workproducts/index.rst @@ -47,27 +47,6 @@ General Trainings for safety and security for S-CORE -.. workproduct:: Quality management plan - :id: wp__qms - :status: draft - :tags: safety - :complies: std_wp__iso26262__management_553 - - Quality management process descriptions and definitions - -.. workproduct:: Quality report - :id: wp__qms_report - :status: draft - :tags: safety - :complies: std_wp__iso26262__management_553 - - | Evidence of quality conformance: - | * Identifies what tasks/activities/process produce the information - | * Identifies when the data was collected - | * Identifies source of any associated data - | * Identifies the associated quality criteria - | * Identifies any associated measurements using the information - Process ^^^^^^^ @@ -78,13 +57,6 @@ Process Process definitions. -.. workproduct:: Process Improvement Report - :id: wp__process_impr_report - :status: draft - :tags: process - - Process improvement report. - .. workproduct:: Process Management Strategy :id: wp__process_plan :status: draft