Persistency CFT [2025-07-31, 2:30 - 4:00 pm]

[sorinmold]

Agenda

Participants

@guysagnes
@sorinmold
@PandaeDo
@joshualicht
@vbogdanb
@umaucher
@Elsaka-Ahmed-JC

Team Feedback

Updated entry page

Persistency CFG General Information

• Pull Requests
  • https://github.com/eclipse-score/inc_mw_per/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed
• Open actions
  • https://github.com/eclipse-score/inc_mw_per/pulls
  • https://github.com/eclipse-score/score/pull/1069/commits

from last week

Persistency

• https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/1442

TL / Arch Meeting Feedback

JSON Parser

• https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/1439

[vbogdanb]

Meeting minutes

• Questions for architecture community:
  • Related to the usage of "inc" folder to differentiate between public and private headers for C++?
  • What hashing algorithm is should be used for the checksum of the persistence data ? And if the algorithm should be addressed in baselibs?
• Mock prototype for the C++ api provided https://github.com/joshualicht/inc_mw_per/tree/mock_api

[sorinmold]

proposal from Persistency Team expected

[sorinmold]

Discussed in the meeting on 07.08.2025 that the model from base libs can be used.

[sorinmold]

Agreed with @vbogdanb on 8.08.2025 that crc32 is ok.

[sorinmold]

Discussed in the meeting on 07.08.2025 that the model from base libs can be used.
--> follow-up in Arch meeting on 11.08.2025. A generic proposal will be made and will be reviewed by Pers team

[umaucher]

I created a "proposal" for a new folder structure based on the description in https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/main/contribute/general/folder.html#module-folder-structure and what's currently done in baselibs. So bascially this means now we have a "component" kvs_cpp with no src / inc structure. Tests I haven't touched for now but basically also this folder would disappear (at least for unit tests)
--> eclipse-score/inc_mw_per#76