Process Development Community [2025-08-7] #1579
aschemmel-tech
started this conversation in
SW Dev Process Community
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Agenda:
Check participants and introduce new members
Align on Agenda for today
Plan, Discuss ongoing PRs, Activities
Plantuml topic: #1416 [@andreas Kaluza)
#1408 - introduce Architecture Decision Records
Impact analysis topic: what shall be analyzed? (@aschemmel-tech, @AlexanderLanin)
no meetings next week
Participants:
@hoe-jo
@kroehnd
@aschemmel-tech
@MaximilianSoerenPollak
@PhilipPartsch
@FScholPer
@ Paul Sherwood
@ Marco Heinemann
@ Felix Mölders
@ Andreas Kaluza
@NarasipurRohini
Meeting Minutes:
Plantuml topic: Presented https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/pr-1416/features/communication/docs/architecture/index.html#static-architecture and #1416 (comment) :
Conclusion: Process community approves color schema, Philip Partsch will comment #1416 and remaining tooling detail will be discussed between Andeas and the Tool community (Max, ...)
Architecture Decision Records: rename to "Decision Record", make it "recommended" takeover template into process_description, @aschemmel-tech to propose a PR with @PhilipPartsch and @FScholPer as reviewers to discuss the "Status" attribute.
Impact Analysis Topic: not covered
@MaximilianSoerenPollak presented the test linkage/reporting prototype as shown in comment below (developed in eclipse-score/docs-as-code#197) - technical solution is using virtual needs to be able to create html ducumentation. What is not possible at the moment is to use the links connected to testcases (point to nowhere). Discussion about storage of test report and test results (which is currently not covered in the prototype), storage is needed but currently not covered in https://eclipse-score.github.io/process_description/main/process_areas/verification/guidance/verification_process_toolreqs.html maybe even high numbers of test results (robustness, statistical testing) on the same testcase are needed. @aschemmel-tech and @PhilipPartsch to align on an additional verification process requirement - see next working meeting.
no meetings next week: due to high attendance re-introduce meetings of next week. Propose to use "Cancelled" invitations.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions