Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
-
@m2mtech just to confirm, do you mean And how do you execute those projections synchronous/asynchronous/polling? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@m2mtech , I think the behavior is now correct since 1.256.0, thanks to changes introduced by #479. Could you confirm ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I agree with @lifinsky that projections really shouldn’t depend on each other. I changed my approach back then and don’t have a suitable setup to check if the changes work with my unfortunate ideas ;) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone,
I have two projectors reacting to the same event from one stream. One projector listens solely to this stream (performing primary processing) while the other listens to two streams, relying on the result from the primary one. I tried using
#[Priority]
to enforce that the single-stream projector runs first, but it appears that the priority is ignored.Here's a simplified code example:
Could it be that
#[Priority]
only applies within the same projector, or is there another recommended approach to ensure the proper execution order across different projectors?Note: This question is non-urgent as I've already resolved my issue by using subevents for the low priority projection.
Thanks for any insights!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions