Commit 8732699
[BPF] Visit nested map array during BTF generation
Fixes missing inner map struct type definitions [^1]. We should visit
the type of nested array of maps like we do for global maps. This patch
adds a boolean to convey the information to visitTypeEntry and
visitDerivedType that the pointee is a map definition and should be
treated as such.
It ressembles and works with commit 0d21c95 ("[BPF] Handle nested
wrapper structs in BPF map definition traversal (llvm#144097)") which
focused on directly nested wrapper structs.
Before that patch, this ARRAY_OF_MAPS definition would lead to the BTF
information include the 'missing_type' as "FWD 'missing_type'
fwd_kind=struct":
struct missing_type { uint64_t foo; };
struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS);
[...]
__array(
values, struct {
[...]
__type(value, struct missing_type);
});
} map SEC(".maps");
Which lead to errors while trying to load the map:
libbpf: map 'outer_map.inner': can't determine value size for type [N]: -22.
To solve this issue, users had to use the struct in a dummy variable or
in a dummy function for the BTF to be generated correctly [^2].
[^1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/T/#u
[^2]: cilium/ebpf#1658 (reply in thread)
Signed-off-by: Mahe Tardy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>1 parent 56ae79a commit 8732699
File tree
2 files changed
+103
-19
lines changed- llvm
- lib/Target/BPF
- test/CodeGen/BPF/BTF
2 files changed
+103
-19
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
963 | 963 | | |
964 | 964 | | |
965 | 965 | | |
966 | | - | |
| 966 | + | |
| 967 | + | |
967 | 968 | | |
968 | 969 | | |
969 | 970 | | |
| |||
973 | 974 | | |
974 | 975 | | |
975 | 976 | | |
976 | | - | |
| 977 | + | |
| 978 | + | |
| 979 | + | |
977 | 980 | | |
978 | 981 | | |
979 | | - | |
980 | | - | |
981 | | - | |
982 | | - | |
983 | | - | |
984 | | - | |
985 | | - | |
986 | | - | |
987 | | - | |
988 | | - | |
989 | | - | |
990 | | - | |
991 | | - | |
992 | | - | |
993 | | - | |
994 | | - | |
995 | | - | |
| 982 | + | |
| 983 | + | |
| 984 | + | |
| 985 | + | |
| 986 | + | |
| 987 | + | |
| 988 | + | |
| 989 | + | |
| 990 | + | |
| 991 | + | |
| 992 | + | |
| 993 | + | |
| 994 | + | |
| 995 | + | |
| 996 | + | |
| 997 | + | |
| 998 | + | |
| 999 | + | |
| 1000 | + | |
| 1001 | + | |
| 1002 | + | |
| 1003 | + | |
| 1004 | + | |
996 | 1005 | | |
997 | 1006 | | |
998 | 1007 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| 1 | + | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | + | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | + | |
| 6 | + | |
| 7 | + | |
| 8 | + | |
| 9 | + | |
| 10 | + | |
| 11 | + | |
| 12 | + | |
| 13 | + | |
| 14 | + | |
| 15 | + | |
| 16 | + | |
| 17 | + | |
| 18 | + | |
| 19 | + | |
| 20 | + | |
| 21 | + | |
| 22 | + | |
| 23 | + | |
| 24 | + | |
| 25 | + | |
| 26 | + | |
| 27 | + | |
| 28 | + | |
| 29 | + | |
| 30 | + | |
| 31 | + | |
| 32 | + | |
| 33 | + | |
| 34 | + | |
| 35 | + | |
| 36 | + | |
| 37 | + | |
| 38 | + | |
| 39 | + | |
| 40 | + | |
| 41 | + | |
| 42 | + | |
| 43 | + | |
| 44 | + | |
| 45 | + | |
| 46 | + | |
| 47 | + | |
| 48 | + | |
| 49 | + | |
| 50 | + | |
| 51 | + | |
| 52 | + | |
| 53 | + | |
| 54 | + | |
| 55 | + | |
| 56 | + | |
| 57 | + | |
| 58 | + | |
| 59 | + | |
| 60 | + | |
| 61 | + | |
| 62 | + | |
| 63 | + | |
| 64 | + | |
| 65 | + | |
| 66 | + | |
| 67 | + | |
| 68 | + | |
| 69 | + | |
| 70 | + | |
| 71 | + | |
| 72 | + | |
| 73 | + | |
| 74 | + | |
| 75 | + | |
0 commit comments