You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A suggestion, regarding Spectrum. Now, if [1]/[7] (freq. steps) are pressed, the left frequency limit stays in place, only the right limit increases/decreases. In this case, the middle of the bandwidth is not centered over the current VFO/Memory frequency, the center “moves” also left/right from VFO/MR frequency.
Same behaviour if [4] is pressed. Number of slices increases/decreases (16/32/64/128), but only the right frequency limit increases/decreases.
In my opinion, it would be more natural that both margins to modify equally, in opposite directions, so the middle of the bandwidth stays on current VFO/Memory frequency, no matter if [1]/[7] pushed.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
A suggestion, regarding Spectrum. Now, if [1]/[7] (freq. steps) are pressed, the left frequency limit stays in place, only the right limit increases/decreases. In this case, the middle of the bandwidth is not centered over the current VFO/Memory frequency, the center “moves” also left/right from VFO/MR frequency.
Same behaviour if [4] is pressed. Number of slices increases/decreases (16/32/64/128), but only the right frequency limit increases/decreases.
In my opinion, it would be more natural that both margins to modify equally, in opposite directions, so the middle of the bandwidth stays on current VFO/Memory frequency, no matter if [1]/[7] pushed.
Best regards.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions